Browse every published brief without JavaScript.
Showing 781–800 of 1712 cases, newest official Court activity first.
October Term 2013 · Docket 12-682
Michigan voters banned race-conscious admissions. the sides that brought the case claim this violates equal protection. the opposing sides argue the ban protects democratic process.
October Term 2013 · Docket 12-729
The dispute centers on whether a plan can start a lawsuit deadline before a claimant receives a final benefits decision.
October Term 2013 · Docket 12-562
The government seeks to tax partners immediately. Taxpayers demand a full partnership audit first.
October Term 2013 · Docket 12-929
A construction firm wants to move a lawsuit to Virginia. The opposing party wants to keep it in Texas.
October Term 2013 · Docket 12-414
The dispute centers on whether a court can find ineffective assistance of counsel based solely on a silent record.
October Term 2013 · Docket 12-536
Appellants argue aggregate caps equalize political influence. The government argues these caps prevent corruption.
October Term 2013 · Docket 12-79
Investors sue lawyers for aiding a Ponzi scheme. The lawyers argue the fraud did not directly involve buying or selling securities.
October Term 2013 · Docket 12-872
the sides that brought the case argue federal law blocks state age discrimination suits. the opposing sides claim state courts retain jurisdiction.
October Term 2012 · Docket 12-484
The dispute centers on the legal standard for proving workplace retaliation under Title VII.
October Term 2012 · Docket 12-547
the sides that brought the case seek federal habeas relief. the opposing sides defend the state court judgment.
October Term 2012 · Docket 11-889
Texas water users seek access to water located in Oklahoma. Oklahoma argues it can deny that access entirely.
October Term 2012 · Docket 12-357
The dispute centers on whether a threat to withhold business counts as taking property under federal extortion law.
October Term 2012 · Docket 11-1221
A state court order conflicts with a federal statute that locks in a named beneficiary.
October Term 2012 · Docket 12-10
The dispute centers on whether federal funding conditions compel recipients to express government views on prostitution.
October Term 2012 · Docket 12-246
Texas prosecutors used a suspect's silence during a police interview as evidence of guilt. The suspect argues this violates the Fifth Amendment.
October Term 2012 · Docket 12-418
The dispute centers on whether federal law can compel a person to register as a sex offender after their federal prison term concludes.
October Term 2012 · Docket 11-798
Truckers claim federal law voids port access rules. The city argues these rules are valid contracts.
October Term 2012 · Docket 12-399
The dispute centers on whether federal law protects a noncustodial biological father's rights over a child's best interests.
October Term 2012 · Docket 12-167
The dispute centers on whether a magistrate judge may urge a defendant to abandon trial rights and accept a plea deal.
October Term 2012 · Docket 12-398
Myriad Genetics holds patents on isolated BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes. the sides that brought the case argue these natural sequences cannot be patented. The Court must decide if isolation creates a patentable invention.