October Term 2013 · Docket 12-872

Can federal courts dismiss age discrimination claims under state law?

the sides that brought the case argue federal law blocks state age discrimination suits. the opposing sides claim state courts retain jurisdiction.

Official caption
Madigan v. Levin
Latest argument session
Latest official Court activity
Latest verified event
Argued
Sources analyzed through
Official Transcript

Verified source milestones

  1. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.

The arguments, in order

This case may have been argued more than once. Each entry below uses that session's official transcript. Later arguments do not erase earlier ones.

  1. Argument 1 ·

    What happened at the argument

    Mr. Scodro argued Congress created specific procedures for age discrimination.

    Mr. Theobald argued the Seventh Circuit lacked jurisdiction over the issue.

    questions_and_answers

    Read the official transcript for this argument · Official argument details

    Sources used for this argument breakdown

A citizen's guide to the whole case

What this case is about

The case tests whether federal age discrimination law preempts state law claims. the sides that brought the case seek dismissal of state claims. the opposing sides want to keep those claims alive.

Official sources for this section

How the case got here

The Supreme Court heard oral argument in this case on October 7, 2013.

Official sources for this section

What each side wants

the sides that brought the case want the Court to dismiss the state law claims.

the opposing sides want the Court to allow the state law claims to proceed.

Official sources for this section

What each side says

the sides that brought the case argue federal law creates a comprehensive remedy system that blocks state claims.

the opposing sides argue the Seventh Circuit lacked jurisdiction to decide the preclusion issue.

Official sources for this section

What the justices asked

Justice Ginsburg asked about the Seventh Circuit's authority to hear the case.

Justice Kennedy asked if the Court is granting certiorari before judgment.

Official sources for this section

Why it matters

This dispute determines whether workers can sue under state age discrimination laws. It defines the scope of federal preemption in employment cases. It affects the availability of legal remedies for older workers.

Official sources for this section

What happens next

This article currently covers the argument record. Use the official docket link for later case activity.

Official sources for this section

Official Court provenance

Official docket and case history · Official Supreme Court oral-argument detail page

Title and summary sources

Revision history

  1. Revision 1 · Official Transcript ·

    Correction: Rewritten to the concise citizen-facing editorial standard.

  2. Revision 2 · Official Transcript ·

    Correction: Migrated to the dated official Court activity contract without model use.

Download this sanitized case as JSON