October Term 2012 · Docket 11-798

Does the FAAAA preemption clause bar port access rules?

Truckers claim federal law voids port access rules. The city argues these rules are valid contracts.

Official caption
American Trucking Assns., Inc. v. Los Angeles
Latest argument session
Latest official Court activity
Latest verified event
Argued
Sources analyzed through
Official Transcript

Verified source milestones

  1. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.

The arguments, in order

This case may have been argued more than once. Each entry below uses that session's official transcript. Later arguments do not erase earlier ones.

  1. Argument 1 ·

    What happened at the argument

    Truckers cite the FAAAA text and the Castle precedent.

    The city compares port rules to standard private property contracts.

    Justices probe the distinction between ports and airfields.

    Justices examine the scope of the market participant exception.

    Read the official transcript for this argument · Official argument details

    Sources used for this argument breakdown

A citizen's guide to the whole case

What this case is about

The dispute centers on whether federal law preempts local port access rules. Truckers argue the FAAAA bars these rules. The city argues the rules are private contracts.

Official sources for this section

How the case got here

The Supreme Court heard oral argument in this case on April 16, 2013.

Official sources for this section

What each side wants

Truckers want the Court to strike down the port access rules.

The city wants the Court to uphold the port access rules.

Official sources for this section

What each side says

Truckers argue the FAAAA preempts these local regulations.

The city argues the rules are private contracts.

Official sources for this section

What the justices asked

Justice Ginsburg asked why Congress regulates ports differently than airfields.

Justice Sotomayor asked if the market participant exception exists.

Official sources for this section

Why it matters

This case defines the scope of federal preemption over local port rules. It affects how cities manage commercial vehicle access. It clarifies the boundary between public regulation and private contracts.

Official sources for this section

What happens next

This article currently covers the argument record. Use the official docket link for later case activity.

Official sources for this section

Official Court provenance

Official docket and case history · Official Supreme Court oral-argument detail page

Title and summary sources

Revision history

  1. Revision 1 · Official Transcript ·

    Correction: Rewritten to the concise citizen-facing editorial standard.

  2. Revision 2 · Official Transcript ·

    Correction: Migrated to the dated official Court activity contract without model use.

Download this sanitized case as JSON