October Term 2003 · Docket 03-167
Does a forfeited Rule 11 error require proof of outcome impact?
The government argues outcome impact is required. The defendant argues the lower court applied the wrong standard.
Browse every published brief without JavaScript.
Showing 1421–1440 of 1712 cases, newest official Court activity first.
October Term 2003 · Docket 03-167
The government argues outcome impact is required. The defendant argues the lower court applied the wrong standard.
October Term 2003 · Docket 03-221
the side that brought the case argues the one-year limit does not apply. the opposing side argues the limit applies to all federal habeas petitions.
October Term 2003 · Docket 03-358
The dispute centers on whether the DOT must certify eligible Mexican trucks after a NAFTA panel found the U.S. ban violated the treaty.
October Term 2003 · Docket 02-572
Intel and AMD dispute whether federal judges can compel evidence for foreign antitrust regulators.
October Term 2003 · Docket 02-891
Two early retirees claim a pension fund broke its promise by cutting their benefits after they took new jobs.
October Term 2003 · Docket 03-526
The dispute centers on whether a judge or jury must determine eligibility for capital punishment.
October Term 2003 · Docket 03-5165
the side that brought the case argues the search violated Belton because officers did not contact him inside the vehicle.
October Term 2003 · Docket 03-95
The dispute centers on whether an employer remains strictly liable when a supervisor's harassment causes an employee to resign rather than face a formal firing.
October Term 2003 · Docket 03-339
The dispute centers on whether federal courts can hear claims for torts committed in a foreign country.
October Term 2003 · Docket 03-6539
The dispute centers on the legal standard for proving jury selection bias.
October Term 2003 · Docket 03-101
The dispute centers on whether the Bureau of Land Management must protect designated wilderness areas under its general land management mandate.
October Term 2003 · Docket 03-6821
David Nelson seeks federal review of his Alabama death sentence. The state argues he must exhaust state options first.
October Term 2003 · Docket 02-1609
Littleton argues for quick judicial review of license denials. Z.J. Gifts argues review speed must match First Amendment risks.
October Term 2003 · Docket 02-1624
A father challenged his daughter's school district. He argued the daily Pledge of Allegiance violates the Constitution.
October Term 2003 · Docket 02-1632
The dispute centers on whether a judge may impose a sentence above the statutory maximum based on facts found without a jury.
October Term 2003 · Docket 02-1845
Insurers argue federal law blocks state tort claims. Patients argue state law allows such suits.
October Term 2003 · Docket 03-5554
The dispute centers on whether a state law requiring detained individuals to identify themselves violates constitutional protections against unreasonable searches.
October Term 2003 · Docket 02-1689
The dispute centers on whether a party's later change in citizenship cures a prior lack of complete diversity.
October Term 2003 · Docket 03-44
The dispute centers on whether federal fraud statutes demand proof that local crimes connect to federal spending.
October Term 2003 · Docket 03-218
The ACLU argues the law bans protected adult speech. The government claims it protects children from online pornography.