October Term 2017 · Docket 16-6795
Does federal law require courts to fund unlimited expert costs for death penalty appeals?
A death row inmate seeks federal funds to hire experts. The state argues the law caps these costs.
Browse every published brief without JavaScript.
Showing 521–540 of 1712 cases, newest official Court activity first.
October Term 2017 · Docket 16-6795
A death row inmate seeks federal funds to hire experts. The state argues the law caps these costs.
October Term 2017 · Docket 16-6855
the sides that brought the case want federal courts to review the last reasoned state decision. the opposing sides want courts to apply the standard to the final summary order.
October Term 2017 · Docket 16-299
Manufacturers argue district courts must review water definitions. The government insists courts of appeals handle these cases.
October Term 2017 · Docket 16-499
Israeli nationals sue a Jordanian bank for wartime injuries. The bank argues U.S. courts lack jurisdiction over foreign entities.
October Term 2017 · Docket 16-658
The parties dispute whether a late appeal notice is a strict legal bar or a flexible deadline.
October Term 2017 · Docket 15-1485
Police arrested guests at a party in a vacant home. The guests claim the officers lacked probable cause.
October Term 2017 · Docket 16-424
The dispute centers on whether entering a guilty plea forfeits a defendant's right to challenge the underlying criminal statute.
October Term 2017 · Docket 15-1204
the sides that brought the case seek individualized hearings. The government argues detention is mandatory.
October Term 2017 · Docket 16-1161
Appellants seek a judicial remedy for extreme district maps. Appellees argue courts lack standards to fix them.
October Term 2017 · Docket 15-1498
The government argues the law is clear. The defendant claims it is vague.
October Term 2017 · Docket 16-285
Employers argue the Federal Arbitration Act enforces individual arbitration clauses. Workers argue the National Labor Relations Act protects collective action rights.
October Term 2016 · Docket 15-1039
Sandoz and Amgen dispute the timing of data exchange required before patent litigation can begin.
October Term 2016 · Docket 16-309
The dispute centers on whether the government must prove a false statement materially affected the naturalization decision to strip citizenship.
October Term 2016 · Docket 16-405
BNSF Railway seeks to limit where injured workers can sue. Workers argue Montana courts hold general jurisdiction over the company.
October Term 2016 · Docket 16-466
Bristol-Myers Squibb disputes a state court ruling that allowed non-California patients to sue there.
October Term 2016 · Docket 16-5294
The dispute centers on whether a defendant receives adequate psychiatric help when the state assigns an expert to the prosecution.
October Term 2016 · Docket 15-577
Missouri excluded a church preschool from a playground safety grant. The church argues this violates the Constitution. The state argues it must avoid funding religion.
October Term 2016 · Docket 16-240
the side that brought the case seeks automatic reversal for a closed jury selection. the opposing side argues the error requires a specific prejudice showing.
October Term 2016 · Docket 16-349
Henson argues Santander is a debt collector. Santander argues it is not.
October Term 2016 · Docket 16-373
Investors argue the repose limit pauses during class actions. The issuer argues it never pauses.