SCOTUS Legal Briefs

Corrections and revisions — page 3

Accepted public revisions are append-only. Earlier summaries remain listed in each case's revision history.

Showing 41–60 of 1711 corrected cases, newest official Court activity first.

  1. Can the President Impose Tariffs Without Congressional Approval?

    Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump, President of U.S. · Docket 24-1287

    Latest official Court activity
    1. Revision 1 — : Rewritten to the concise citizen-facing editorial standard.
    2. Revision 2 — : Migrated to the dated official Court activity contract without model use.

  2. Can a Federal Court Fix a Jurisdictional Mistake by Erasing a Defendant It Wrongly Dismissed?

    Hain Celestial Group v. Palmquist · Docket 24-724

    Latest official Court activity
    1. Revision 1 — : Rewritten to the concise citizen-facing editorial standard.
    2. Revision 2 — : Removed an unsupported statement that the Court had not ruled; the available source set did not establish that absence.
    3. Revision 3 — : Corrected unsupported no-ruling language and clarified that the article's disposition summary is incomplete.
    4. Revision 4 — : Added the holding and disposition from the verified official Court opinion.
    5. Revision 5 — : Added the holding and disposition from the verified official Court opinion.
    6. Revision 6 — : Migrated to the dated official Court activity contract without model use.

  3. Does a time limit apply to vacating a void judgment?

    Coney Island Auto Parts, Inc. v. Burton · Docket 24-808

    Latest official Court activity
    1. Revision 1 — : Rewritten to the concise citizen-facing editorial standard.
    2. Revision 2 — : Migrated to the dated official Court activity contract without model use.

  4. Does Time Spent Fugitive Count Toward a Supervised Release Term?

    Rico v. United States · Docket 24-1056

    Latest official Court activity
    1. Revision 1 — : Rewritten to the concise citizen-facing editorial standard.
    2. Revision 2 — : Removed an unsupported statement that the Court had not ruled; the available source set did not establish that absence.
    3. Revision 3 — : Corrected unsupported no-ruling language and clarified that the article's disposition summary is incomplete.
    4. Revision 4 — : Added the holding and disposition from the verified official Court opinion.
    5. Revision 5 — : Migrated to the dated official Court activity contract without model use.

  5. Can State Tort Law Claims Against a Military Contractor Go Forward at a Foreign War Zone?

    Hencely v. Fluor Corp. · Docket 24-924

    Latest official Court activity
    1. Revision 1 — : Rewritten to the concise citizen-facing editorial standard.
    2. Revision 2 — : Removed an unsupported statement that the Court had not ruled; the available source set did not establish that absence.
    3. Revision 3 — : Corrected unsupported no-ruling language and clarified that the article's disposition summary is incomplete.
    4. Revision 4 — : Added the holding and disposition from the verified official Court opinion.
    5. Revision 5 — : Migrated to the dated official Court activity contract without model use.

  6. Can Louisiana Draw a Congressional Map That Uses Race to Remedy Vote Dilution?

    Louisiana v. Callais · Docket 24-109

    Latest official Court activity
    1. Revision 1 — : Rewritten to the concise citizen-facing editorial standard.
    2. Revision 2 — : Removed an unsupported statement that the Court had not ruled; the available source set did not establish that absence.
    3. Revision 3 — : Corrected unsupported no-ruling language and clarified that the article's disposition summary is incomplete.
    4. Revision 4 — : Added the holding and disposition from the verified official Court opinion.
    5. Revision 5 — : Migrated to the dated official Court activity contract without model use.

  7. Can Police Enter a Home Without a Warrant to Stop a Suicide?

    Case v. Montana · Docket 24-624

    Latest official Court activity
    1. Revision 1 — : Rewritten to the concise citizen-facing editorial standard.
    2. Revision 2 — : Removed an unsupported statement that the Court had not ruled; the available source set did not establish that absence.
    3. Revision 3 — : Corrected unsupported no-ruling language and clarified that the article's disposition summary is incomplete.
    4. Revision 4 — : Added the holding and disposition from the verified official Court opinion.
    5. Revision 5 — : Migrated to the dated official Court activity contract without model use.

  8. Does the Ex Post Facto Clause bar retroactive restitution orders?

    Ellingburg v. United States · Docket 24-482

    Latest official Court activity
    1. Revision 1 — : Rewritten to the concise citizen-facing editorial standard.
    2. Revision 2 — : Migrated to the dated official Court activity contract without model use.

  10. Does the Postal Exception Cover Mail Withheld by Postal Employees?

    USPS v. Konan · Docket 24-351

    Latest official Court activity
    1. Revision 1 — : Rewritten to the concise citizen-facing editorial standard.
    2. Revision 2 — : Removed an unsupported statement that the Court had not ruled; the available source set did not establish that absence.
    3. Revision 3 — : Corrected unsupported no-ruling language and clarified that the article's disposition summary is incomplete.
    4. Revision 4 — : Added the holding and disposition from the verified official Court opinion.
    5. Revision 5 — : Removed direct-quotation marks from public paraphrases.
    6. Revision 6 — : Migrated to the dated official Court activity contract without model use.

  11. Can a Candidate Challenge a Rule That Counts Mail Ballots Two Weeks After Election Day?

    Bost v. IL Bd. of Elections · Docket 24-568

    Latest official Court activity
    1. Revision 1 — : Rewritten to the concise citizen-facing editorial standard.
    2. Revision 2 — : Removed an unsupported statement that the Court had not ruled; the available source set did not establish that absence.
    3. Revision 3 — : Corrected unsupported no-ruling language and clarified that the article's disposition summary is incomplete.
    4. Revision 4 — : Added the holding and disposition from the verified official Court opinion.
    5. Revision 5 — : Migrated to the dated official Court activity contract without model use.

  14. Does Delaware's Rule Requiring an Expert Affidavit Before Filing a Medical Malpractice Lawsuit Conflict with Federal Court Procedures?

    Berk v. Choy · Docket 24-440

    Latest official Court activity
    1. Revision 1 — : Rewritten to the concise citizen-facing editorial standard.
    2. Revision 2 — : Removed an unsupported statement that the Court had not ruled; the available source set did not establish that absence.
    3. Revision 3 — : Corrected unsupported no-ruling language and clarified that the article's disposition summary is incomplete.
    4. Revision 4 — : Added the holding and disposition from the verified official Court opinion.
    5. Revision 5 — : Added the holding and disposition from the verified official Court opinion.
    6. Revision 6 — : Migrated to the dated official Court activity contract without model use.

  15. Can a Trial Court Bar a Defendant From Discussing His Testimony With His Lawyer During an Overnight Recess?

    Villarreal v. Texas · Docket 24-557

    Latest official Court activity
    1. Revision 1 — : Rewritten to the concise citizen-facing editorial standard.
    2. Revision 2 — : Removed an unsupported statement that the Court had not ruled; the available source set did not establish that absence.
    3. Revision 3 — : Corrected unsupported no-ruling language and clarified that the article's disposition summary is incomplete.
    4. Revision 4 — : Added the holding and disposition from the verified official Court opinion.
    5. Revision 5 — : Migrated to the dated official Court activity contract without model use.

  16. Can Federal Judges Block a Federal Policy Everywhere With One Order?

    Trump v. CASA, Inc. · Docket 24A884

    Latest official Court activity
    1. Revision 1 — : Rewritten to the concise citizen-facing editorial standard.
    2. Revision 2 — : Removed an unsupported statement that the Court had not ruled; the available source set did not establish that absence.
    3. Revision 3 — : Corrected unsupported no-ruling language and clarified that the article's disposition summary is incomplete.
    4. Revision 4 — : Added the holding and disposition from the verified official Court opinion.
    5. Revision 5 — : Migrated to the dated official Court activity contract without model use.

  17. Can Oklahoma exclude religious charter schools from public funding?

    OK Charter School Board v. Drummond · Docket 24-394

    Latest official Court activity
    1. Revision 1 — : Rewritten to the concise citizen-facing editorial standard.
    2. Revision 2 — : Migrated to the dated official Court activity contract without model use.

  18. Can a class include members who lack a legal injury?

    Laboratory Corp. of America v. Davis · Docket 24-304

    Latest official Court activity
    1. Revision 1 — : Rewritten to the concise citizen-facing editorial standard.
    2. Revision 2 — : Migrated to the dated official Court activity contract without model use.

  19. Does the FTCA bar claims against federal police for lawful acts?

    Martin v. United States · Docket 24-362

    Latest official Court activity
    1. Revision 1 — : Rewritten to the concise citizen-facing editorial standard.
    2. Revision 2 — : Migrated to the dated official Court activity contract without model use.