October Term 2006 · Docket 05-1342
Can states regulate a national bank's mortgage subsidiary?
the sides that brought the case argue state law applies to the subsidiary. the opposing sides claim federal law preempts state regulation.
Showing 41–60 of 65 cases, newest official Court activity first.
October Term 2006 · Docket 05-1342
the sides that brought the case argue state law applies to the subsidiary. the opposing sides claim federal law preempts state regulation.
October Term 2006 · Docket 04-1350
The dispute centers on whether a rigid legal test wrongly protects patents that combine known elements without a clear reason.
October Term 2006 · Docket 05-381
The dispute centers on whether aggressive buyer bidding violates antitrust law.
October Term 2006 · Docket 05-1074
The dispute centers on whether an employee can sue for pay discrimination based on a past decision that continues to affect current wages.
October Term 2006 · Docket 05-1126
Competitors dispute whether simple market parallelism proves a Sherman Act violation.
October Term 2006 · Docket 05-1382
The dispute centers on whether a federal law banning a specific late-term abortion method is constitutional.
October Term 2006 · Docket 05-9222
The dispute centers on whether judges need a jury to find new facts before imposing consecutive sentences based on prior convictions.
October Term 2006 · Docket 05-9264
The dispute centers on whether a Florida attempted burglary conviction qualifies as a violent felony under federal law.
October Term 2006 · Docket 05-1240
The dispute centers on the timing of civil lawsuits for Fourth Amendment violations.
October Term 2006 · Docket 05-996
Marrama argues the court lacks power to deny his conversion request. Citizens Bank argues the court must deny it to punish bad faith.
October Term 2006 · Docket 05-595
the sides that brought the case seek to block a new rule. the opposing sides demand its application.
October Term 2006 · Docket 05-848
Environmental groups and Duke Energy dispute how to measure pollution increases under federal air rules.
October Term 2006 · Docket 05-1256
Philip Morris seeks to remove a jury award for harm to nonparties. Williams defends the award as proper.
October Term 2006 · Docket 05-8820
Lawrence argues his state application tolls the deadline. Florida says the deadline runs regardless.
October Term 2006 · Docket 05-593
A state tort plaintiff and a federal employee dispute whether the Westfall Act bars state court review of the employee's job-related conduct.
October Term 2006 · Docket 05-7058
Prisoners argue they need not prove they used internal complaint systems. Officials argue courts must dismiss cases lacking that proof.
October Term 2006 · Docket 05-6551
California's sentencing law lets judges pick higher terms based on facts they find. the sides that brought the case argue this violates jury trial rights.
October Term 2006 · Docket 05-785
The dispute centers on whether a state court applied the correct legal standard when it denied a defendant's claim that spectator photo buttons prejudiced his trial.
October Term 2006 · Docket 05-705
Global Crossing and Metrophones dispute whether FCC pay phone rules create a private right to sue for damages.
October Term 2006 · Docket 05-746
The dispute centers on whether a railroad must prove a direct causal link between a worker's negligence and their injury to reduce damages.