October Term 2006 · Docket 05-998
Can a missing indictment element be harmless error?
The government argues a missing indictment element is harmless. The defendant argues it is a constitutional violation.
Showing 61–65 of 65 cases, newest official Court activity first.
October Term 2006 · Docket 05-998
The government argues a missing indictment element is harmless. The defendant argues it is a constitutional violation.
October Term 2006 · Docket 05-608
MedImmune seeks to challenge a patent's validity. Genentech argues the license contract bars that suit.
October Term 2006 · Docket 05-669
BP argues the six-year limit applies to agency proceedings. The government says it applies only to court suits.
October Term 2006 · Docket 05-493
the side that brought the case argues the instruction limits mitigation to pre-crime facts. the opposing side claims it allows full moral consideration.
October Term 2006 · Docket 05-547
the sides that brought the case argue state drug crimes are not federal aggravated felonies. The government disagrees.