October Term 2005 · Docket 04-1152
Does the Solomon Amendment violate university speech rights?
Universities argue the law forces them to host military recruiters. The government argues the law merely conditions funding on equal access.
Showing 1001–1020 of 1389 cases, newest official Court activity first.
October Term 2005 · Docket 04-1152
Universities argue the law forces them to host military recruiters. The government argues the law merely conditions funding on equal access.
October Term 2005 · Docket 04-593
Domino's argues John McDonald lost his 1981 protections by forming a corporation. McDonald claims the federal law applies to him personally.
October Term 2005 · Docket 04-1131
The dispute centers on whether the Civil Service Reform Act bars federal courts from hearing constitutional claims by federal employees.
October Term 2005 · Docket 04-52
The dispute centers on whether a prosecutor must provide a specific reason for striking a juror during a Batson challenge.
October Term 2005 · Docket 04-1144
Planned Parenthood argues the state law forces doctors to break medical ethics. The state claims the law protects minors.
October Term 2005 · Docket 04-1244
Clinic owners and anti-abortion activists dispute whether the Hobbs Act allows private parties to seek court orders against protest activities.
October Term 2005 · Docket 04-1264
A check-cashing company wants a judge to dismiss a lawsuit. A customer wants an arbitrator to hear the case.
October Term 2005 · Docket 04-1329
Illinois Tool Works argues a patent on a razor blade creates market power for the entire razor system. Independent Ink disputes this legal presumption.
October Term 2005 · Docket 04-1186
Wachovia Bank argues its main office defines its state citizenship. Schmidt argues every branch location counts.
October Term 2005 · Docket 04-1332
the sides that brought the case seek to dismiss a Bivens claim. the opposing sides argue the prior dismissal does not bar it.
October Term 2005 · Docket 04-1203
The dispute centers on whether federal disability law overrides state immunity in prison cases.
October Term 2005 · Docket 04-721
the sides that brought the case argue the phrase proves timeliness. the opposing sides argue it does not. The Court must decide if this phrase settles the deadline dispute.
October Term 2005 · Docket 04-1067
The dispute centers on whether police may search a home when one resident consents and another expressly refuses.
October Term 2005 · Docket 04-1140
the sides that brought the case seek fees for defending a removal motion. the opposing sides argue no statute grants this right.
October Term 2005 · Docket 04-848
Dolan seeks damages for a late package. The Postal Service denies liability under the federal waiver.
October Term 2005 · Docket 04-881
The dispute centers on whether a specific statute overrides the general ban on collecting student loans from Social Security benefits.
October Term 2005 · Docket 04-1084
The government argues the law bans all Schedule 1 drugs. The church argues the law must allow religious exceptions.
October Term 2005 · Docket 04-373
Maryland argues that a warning cures a bad interrogation. Blake argues that such warnings hide police abuse.
October Term 2005 · Docket 04-885
The dispute centers on whether federal bankruptcy laws override state sovereign immunity.
October Term 2005 · Docket 04-905
Volvo Trucks and Reeder-Simco GMC dispute whether a dealer who loses a bid can sue for price discrimination.