October Term 2005 · Docket 04-1203

Does the ADA strip state sovereign immunity for prison disability claims?

The dispute centers on whether federal disability law overrides state immunity in prison cases.

Official caption
United States v. Georgia
Latest argument session
Latest official Court activity
Latest verified event
Argued
Sources analyzed through
Official Transcript

Verified source milestones

  1. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.
  2. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.

The arguments, in order

This case may have been argued more than once. Each entry below uses that session's official transcript. Later arguments do not erase earlier ones.

  1. Argument 1 ·

    What happened at the argument

    General Clement argued the ADA validly abrogates state immunity.

    Mr. Bagenstos argued the ADA is congruent with prison needs.

    Mr. Schaerr argued the Rehabilitation Act requires intentional conduct.

    Read the official transcript for this argument · Official argument details

    Sources used for this argument breakdown

A citizen's guide to the whole case

What this case is about

This case tests the scope of federal disability law against state power.

Official sources for this section

How the case got here

The Supreme Court heard oral argument in this case on November 9, 2005.

Official sources for this section

What each side wants

The United States wants the ADA to override state immunity in prison cases.

Georgia wants to keep its sovereign immunity from federal disability suits.

Official sources for this section

What each side says

The United States argues the ADA is a valid exercise of congressional power.

Georgia argues the ADA exceeds Congress's authority over state prisons.

Official sources for this section

What the justices asked

Justice Kennedy asked if constitutional barriers exist for these claims.

Justice Scalia asked about exhaustion requirements under prison laws.

Official sources for this section

Why it matters

This case defines the balance between federal disability rights and state control.

Official sources for this section

What happens next

This article currently covers the argument record. Use the official docket link for later case activity.

Official sources for this section

Official Court provenance

Official docket and case history · Official Supreme Court oral-argument detail page

Title and summary sources

Revision history

  1. Revision 1 · Official Transcript ·

    Correction: Rewritten to the concise citizen-facing editorial standard.

  2. Revision 2 · Official Transcript ·

    Correction: Migrated to the dated official Court activity contract without model use.

Download this sanitized case as JSON