Showing 601–620 of 1389 cases, newest official Court activity first.
October Term 2011 · Docket 10-1001
Arizona requires defendants to raise ineffective assistance claims in state postconviction proceedings. the side that brought the case argues this rule blocks federal habeas review.
October Term 2011 · Docket 10-63
the sides that brought the case seek relief for a missed deadline caused by lawyer abandonment. the opposing sides argue the state must enforce strict filing rules.
October Term 2011 · Docket 10-680
The dispute centers on whether a prisoner isolated for questioning about outside conduct is in custody.
October Term 2011 · Docket 09-958
the sides that brought the case seek a private right of action. the opposing sides argue Congress denied such a remedy.
October Term 2011 · Docket 10-6549
The dispute centers on whether a federal law requiring sex offender registration applies to individuals convicted before the law took effect.
October Term 2010 · Docket 10-568
Nevada officials argue recusal rules protect integrity. Carrigan claims they punish political association.
October Term 2010 · Docket 10-779
Vermont argues the law protects doctor privacy. IMS Health argues the law restricts speech.
October Term 2010 · Docket 09-1403
Investors seek class status. The company argues individual reliance issues block certification.
October Term 2010 · Docket 10-5258
The dispute centers on whether a state law change that increased a maximum sentence applies to past convictions.
October Term 2010 · Docket 10-382
The Jicarilla Apache Nation seeks legal advice from the government. The government claims privilege blocks that disclosure.
October Term 2010 · Docket 10-174
States sue power companies over climate change. The companies argue courts lack authority to set environmental policy.
October Term 2010 · Docket 10-290
Microsoft seeks a preponderance standard to invalidate patents. i4i defends the clear and convincing evidence rule.
October Term 2010 · Docket 10-5400
The dispute centers on whether a sentencing judge may lengthen a prison term to ensure a defendant receives specific correctional treatment.
October Term 2010 · Docket 09-993
Plaintiffs claim generic makers ignored safety risks. Defendants argue federal law blocks such claims.
October Term 2010 · Docket 10-313
Competitors demand new physical connections. Incumbents refuse to build them.
October Term 2010 · Docket 10-277
Plaintiffs seek to certify a massive class based on decentralized decisions. The company argues this lacks a common core.
October Term 2010 · Docket 10-5443
The dispute centers on whether the government must prove a defendant intended to prevent a witness from reporting a federal crime to a federal officer.
October Term 2010 · Docket 10-235
CSX argues FELA requires a proximate cause instruction. McBride argues the statute only requires negligence.
October Term 2010 · Docket 10-238
the sides that brought the case argue the law chills speech. the opposing sides claim it fights corruption.
October Term 2010 · Docket 09-11121
The dispute centers on whether a 13-year-old's age must influence the legal definition of custody during police questioning.