October Term 2018 · Docket 17-778
Does a burglary conviction require proof of remaining inside a building?
The dispute centers on whether federal law counts state burglary convictions that lack a specific remaining-in element.
Showing 1–20 of 66 cases, newest official Court activity first.
October Term 2018 · Docket 17-778
The dispute centers on whether federal law counts state burglary convictions that lack a specific remaining-in element.
October Term 2018 · Docket 18-489
Creditors argue good faith excuses bankruptcy violations. Debtors argue this rule ignores court orders.
October Term 2018 · Docket 17-9560
The dispute centers on whether federal law requires proof that a defendant knew their own legal status before convicting them for possessing a firearm.
October Term 2018 · Docket 18-6210
Wisconsin claims implied consent laws allow phone searches. The driver argues this violates the Fourth Amendment.
October Term 2018 · Docket 18-525
Fort Bend County argues a missed deadline bars the case. Davis argues the deadline is a procedural rule.
October Term 2018 · Docket 18-431
The dispute centers on whether a vague statutory clause allows courts to convict defendants based on subjective risk assessments.
October Term 2018 · Docket 18-485
The dispute centers on whether a plaintiff must prove the criminal case ended in their favor to sue a prosecutor for fabricating evidence.
October Term 2018 · Docket 18-389
Parker Drilling argues federal law preempts state wage rules. Newton claims California law applies to offshore workers.
October Term 2018 · Docket 18-457
North Carolina taxes trust income using a beneficiary's state residency. The trust argues this violates the Commerce Clause.
October Term 2018 · Docket 18-302
The dispute centers on whether the Lanham Act allows the government to reject trademarks it deems scandalous.
October Term 2018 · Docket 18-459
Emulex seeks to bar private negligence claims under securities law. Varjabedian argues the statute permits such suits.
October Term 2018 · Docket 18-15
The dispute centers on whether judges must accept agency explanations of unclear regulations or retain full authority to interpret the law.
October Term 2018 · Docket 18-422
Appellants seek dismissal of partisan gerrymandering claims. Appellees seek judicial review of North Carolina maps.
October Term 2018 · Docket 18-726
Appellants seek to invalidate Maryland’s congressional map. Appellees defend the map’s legality.
October Term 2018 · Docket 17-1705
The parties dispute whether district courts may invalidate FCC rules or must defer to agency interpretations.
October Term 2018 · Docket 18-266
The dispute centers on whether maritime law allows punitive damages for unseaworthiness claims.
October Term 2018 · Docket 17-9572
Mississippi prosecutors removed most Black jurors in five prior trials. The state argues the sixth trial's removals were race-neutral. The defendant claims the pattern proves racial intent.
October Term 2018 · Docket 18-315
Cochise Consultancy argues the deadline stays fixed. The government argues intervention resets it.
October Term 2018 · Docket 17-1606
The parties dispute whether a late appeal dismissal ends the disability claim.
October Term 2018 · Docket 18-281
Virginia legislators claim the state attorney general wrongly refused to appeal a federal court order. They argue the House has standing to defend its own redistricting plan.