October Term 2018 · Docket 18-422

Can courts fix partisan gerrymanders?

Appellants seek dismissal of partisan gerrymandering claims. Appellees seek judicial review of North Carolina maps.

Official caption
Rucho v. Common Cause
Latest argument session
Latest official Court activity
Latest verified event
Argued
Sources analyzed through
Official Transcript

Verified source milestones

  1. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.
  2. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.

The arguments, in order

This case may have been argued more than once. Each entry below uses that session's official transcript. Later arguments do not erase earlier ones.

  1. Argument 1 ·

    What happened at the argument

    Appellants claim the Court failed to find a justiciable standard.

    Appellees assert the maps represent extreme partisan rigging.

    justice_sotomayor_questioned_if_tests_address_proportionate_representation

    justice_ginsburg_questioned_if_party_affiliation_reduces_vote_weight

    Read the official transcript for this argument · Official argument details

    Sources used for this argument breakdown

A citizen's guide to the whole case

What this case is about

This case tests whether federal courts can resolve partisan gerrymandering disputes. The parties disagree on the existence of a manageable legal standard.

Official sources for this section

How the case got here

The Supreme Court heard oral argument in this case on March 26, 2019.

Official sources for this section

What each side wants

Appellants want the Supreme Court to dismiss the case as non-justiciable.

Appellees want the Supreme Court to uphold the lower court's review.

Official sources for this section

What each side says

Appellants argue no manageable standard exists for partisan gerrymandering claims.

Appellees argue courts can review maps using established legal principles.

Official sources for this section

What the justices asked

Justice Sotomayor asked if proposed tests address proportionate representation.

Justice Ginsburg asked if party affiliation reduces a vote's equal weight.

Official sources for this section

Why it matters

This dispute defines the role of courts in redistricting. It determines whether partisan map challenges remain in the political sphere.

Official sources for this section

What happens next

This article currently covers the argument record. Use the official docket link for later case activity.

Official sources for this section

Official Court provenance

Official docket and case history · Official Supreme Court oral-argument detail page

Title and summary sources

Revision history

  1. Revision 1 · Official Transcript ·

    Correction: Rewritten to the concise citizen-facing editorial standard.

  2. Revision 2 · Official Transcript ·

    Correction: Migrated to the dated official Court activity contract without model use.

Download this sanitized case as JSON