October Term 2016 — page 2

Showing 21–40 of 58 cases, newest official Court activity first.

  1. October Term 2016 · Docket 15-1031

    Can state courts divide military retirement pay in divorce?

    Divorced military spouses dispute whether state courts can treat retirement pay as marital property.

    Case
    Howell v. Howell
    Latest official Court activity
    Latest verified event
    Argued
    Sources analyzed through
    Official Transcript
  2. October Term 2016 · Docket 15-214

    Can a state merge two adjacent lots into one for development limits?

    The Murrs claim Wisconsin merged their two lots illegally. The state says the lots legally count as one unit.

    Case
    Murr v. Wisconsin
    Latest official Court activity
    Latest verified event
    Argued
    Sources analyzed through
    Official Transcript
  3. October Term 2016 · Docket 16-149

    Does federal law block state bans on insurance subrogation?

    Coventry Health Care argues federal law preempts Missouri's ban on subrogation. Nevils argues state law remains valid.

    Case
    Coventry Health Care of Mo. v. Nevils
    Latest official Court activity
    Latest verified event
    Argued
    Sources analyzed through
    Official Transcript
  4. October Term 2016 · Docket 15-9260

    Can a judge reduce a mandatory 30-year sentence to one day?

    The dispute centers on whether a judge can lower a mandatory 30-year sentence to one day.

    Case
    Dean v. United States
    Latest official Court activity
    Latest verified event
    Argued
    Sources analyzed through
    Official Transcript
  5. October Term 2016 · Docket 15-1194

    Can a state ban sex offenders from social media sites?

    North Carolina bars registered sex offenders from accessing social networking sites. the side that brought the case argues this law violates free speech rights.

    Case
    Packingham v. North Carolina
    Latest official Court activity
    Latest verified event
    Argued
    Sources analyzed through
    Official Transcript
  6. October Term 2016 · Docket 16-32

    Does Kentucky law require special rules for arbitration powers of attorney?

    the sides that brought the case argue Kentucky applies stricter rules to arbitration powers of attorney than to general contracts.

    Case
    Kindred Nursing Centers Ltd. v. Clark
    Latest official Court activity
    Latest verified event
    Argued
    Sources analyzed through
    Official Transcript
  7. October Term 2016 · Docket 15-118

    Can a Mexican national sue a U.S. agent for a cross-border shooting?

    The dispute centers on whether the Fourth Amendment protects a Mexican national shot by a U.S. agent from inside the United States.

    Case
    Hernandez v. Mesa
    Latest official Court activity
    Latest verified event
    Argued
    Sources analyzed through
    Official Transcript
  8. October Term 2016 · Docket 15-1248

    Who decides if the EEOC subpoena is too broad?

    McLane seeks a strict legal standard to limit EEOC subpoenas. The agency argues courts must defer to its investigative choices.

    Case
    McLane Co. v. EEOC
    Latest official Court activity
    Latest verified event
    Argued
    Sources analyzed through
    Official Transcript
  9. October Term 2016 · Docket 15-1358

    Can federal officials face Bivens suits for post-9/11 detention policies?

    Plaintiffs seek damages for prolonged solitary confinement. Officials claim qualified immunity and prior precedent bar the claims.

    Case
    Ziglar v. Abbasi
    Latest official Court activity
    Latest verified event
    Argued
    Sources analyzed through
    Official Transcript
  10. October Term 2016 · Docket 15-1498

    Is the federal crime of violence definition too vague to convict?

    The dispute centers on whether a federal statute defining violent crimes is unconstitutionally vague.

    Case
    Lynch v. Dimaya
    Latest official Court activity
    Latest verified event
    Argued
    Sources analyzed through
    Official Transcript
  11. October Term 2016 · Docket 15-1391

    Can New York ban merchants from telling customers credit cards cost more?

    New York merchants want to tell customers credit cards cost more. The state says this law bans that pricing practice.

    Case
    Expressions Hair Design v. Schneiderman
    Latest official Court activity
    Latest verified event
    Argued
    Sources analyzed through
    Official Transcript
  12. October Term 2016 · Docket 15-1406

    How much proof links bad conduct to legal fees?

    The parties dispute the standard for proving that misconduct caused specific legal costs.

    Case
    Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Haeger
    Latest official Court activity
    Latest verified event
    Argued
    Sources analyzed through
    Official Transcript
  13. October Term 2016 · Docket 15-649

    Can bankruptcy courts approve settlements that bypass statutory creditor priority?

    the sides that brought the case argue the bankruptcy court wrongly approved a settlement that paid some creditors more than others. the opposing sides claim the court had discretion to approve the deal.

    Case
    Czyzewski v. Jevic Holding Corp.
    Latest official Court activity
    Latest verified event
    Argued
    Sources analyzed through
    Official Transcript
  14. October Term 2016 · Docket 14-1538

    Does supplying one component abroad infringe a U.S. patent?

    Life Technologies and Promega dispute whether exporting a single part violates U.S. patent law.

    Case
    Life Technologies Corp. v. Promega Corp.
    Latest official Court activity
    Latest verified event
    Argued
    Sources analyzed through
    Official Transcript
  15. October Term 2016 · Docket 15-1262

    Did race or politics drive North Carolina district lines?

    North Carolina officials and voters dispute whether race or politics shaped two congressional maps.

    Case
    McCrory v. Harris
    Latest official Court activity
    Latest verified event
    Argued
    Sources analyzed through
    Official Transcript
  16. October Term 2016 · Docket 15-680

    Does a racial target alone trigger strict scrutiny?

    Appellants argue a 55 percent floor violates the Constitution. Appellees claim the district court wrongly required a conflict with traditional principles.

    Case
    Bethune-Hill v. Virginia State Bd. of Elections
    Latest official Court activity
    Latest verified event
    Argued
    Sources analyzed through
    Official Transcript