October Term 2016 · Docket 15-1391

Can New York ban merchants from telling customers credit cards cost more?

New York merchants want to tell customers credit cards cost more. The state says this law bans that pricing practice.

Official caption
Expressions Hair Design v. Schneiderman
Latest argument session
Latest official Court activity
Latest verified event
Argued
Sources analyzed through
Official Transcript

Verified source milestones

  1. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.
  2. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.

The arguments, in order

This case may have been argued more than once. Each entry below uses that session's official transcript. Later arguments do not erase earlier ones.

  1. Argument 1 ·

    What happened at the argument

    Mr. Gupta argued the law suppresses the message that cards cost more.

    Mr. Wu argued the statute refers only to a pricing practice.

    Justice Kagan questioned whether the law restricts specific speech.

    Read the official transcript for this argument · Official argument details

    Sources used for this argument breakdown

A citizen's guide to the whole case

What this case is about

New York law bans sellers from adding a fee to credit card purchases. Merchants say this law stops them from telling customers the truth about card costs. The state says the law only controls pricing, not speech.

Official sources for this section

How the case got here

The Supreme Court heard oral argument in this case on January 10, 2017.

Official sources for this section

What each side wants

Merchants want to tell customers credit cards cost more.

The state wants to keep the surcharge ban in place.

Official sources for this section

What each side says

Merchants argue the law bans truthful speech about card costs.

The state argues the law only regulates a pricing practice.

Official sources for this section

What the justices asked

Justice Kagan asked what specific speech the law restricts.

Justice Kagan asked how the law violates the Constitution.

Official sources for this section

Why it matters

This case defines the line between price regulation and free speech. It affects how merchants communicate costs to consumers. It shapes state power to control commercial messaging.

Official sources for this section

What happens next

This article currently covers the argument record. Use the official docket link for later case activity.

Official sources for this section

Official Court provenance

Official docket and case history · Official Supreme Court oral-argument detail page

Title and summary sources

Revision history

  1. Revision 1 · Official Transcript ·

    Correction: Rewritten to the concise citizen-facing editorial standard.

  2. Revision 2 · Official Transcript ·

    Correction: Migrated to the dated official Court activity contract without model use.

Download this sanitized case as JSON