October Term 2010 · Docket 10-568
Does a conflict-of-interest recusal law violate free speech?
Nevada officials argue recusal rules protect integrity. Carrigan claims they punish political association.
Showing 1–20 of 78 cases, newest official Court activity first.
October Term 2010 · Docket 10-568
Nevada officials argue recusal rules protect integrity. Carrigan claims they punish political association.
October Term 2010 · Docket 10-779
Vermont argues the law protects doctor privacy. IMS Health argues the law restricts speech.
October Term 2010 · Docket 09-1403
Investors seek class status. The company argues individual reliance issues block certification.
October Term 2010 · Docket 10-5258
The dispute centers on whether a state law change that increased a maximum sentence applies to past convictions.
October Term 2010 · Docket 10-382
The Jicarilla Apache Nation seeks legal advice from the government. The government claims privilege blocks that disclosure.
October Term 2010 · Docket 10-174
States sue power companies over climate change. The companies argue courts lack authority to set environmental policy.
October Term 2010 · Docket 10-290
Microsoft seeks a preponderance standard to invalidate patents. i4i defends the clear and convincing evidence rule.
October Term 2010 · Docket 10-5400
The dispute centers on whether a sentencing judge may lengthen a prison term to ensure a defendant receives specific correctional treatment.
October Term 2010 · Docket 09-993
Plaintiffs claim generic makers ignored safety risks. Defendants argue federal law blocks such claims.
October Term 2010 · Docket 10-313
Competitors demand new physical connections. Incumbents refuse to build them.
October Term 2010 · Docket 10-277
Plaintiffs seek to certify a massive class based on decentralized decisions. The company argues this lacks a common core.
October Term 2010 · Docket 10-5443
The dispute centers on whether the government must prove a defendant intended to prevent a witness from reporting a federal crime to a federal officer.
October Term 2010 · Docket 10-235
CSX argues FELA requires a proximate cause instruction. McBride argues the statute only requires negligence.
October Term 2010 · Docket 10-238
the sides that brought the case argue the law chills speech. the opposing sides claim it fights corruption.
October Term 2010 · Docket 09-11121
The dispute centers on whether a 13-year-old's age must influence the legal definition of custody during police questioning.
October Term 2010 · Docket 10-10
The dispute centers on whether a parent facing jail time for unpaid child support must have a lawyer appointed by the state.
October Term 2010 · Docket 09-1476
The dispute centers on whether the First Amendment Petition Clause shields public employees from retaliation for speech that does not address public concerns.
October Term 2010 · Docket 10-114
Fox seeks full attorney fees. Vice argues for excluding state-law costs.
October Term 2010 · Docket 09-11328
The dispute centers on whether the exclusionary rule applies when officers rely on a specific circuit court decision.
October Term 2010 · Docket 09-11556
New York wants to use driver records found during a stop. The driver wants those records thrown out.