October Term 2010 · Docket 09-11556

Can police use DMV records found during an illegal traffic stop?

New York wants to use driver records found during a stop. The driver wants those records thrown out.

Official caption
Tolentino v. New York
Latest argument session
Latest official Court activity
Latest verified event
Argued
Sources analyzed through
Official Transcript

Verified source milestones

  1. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.

The arguments, in order

This case may have been argued more than once. Each entry below uses that session's official transcript. Later arguments do not erase earlier ones.

  1. Argument 1 ·

    What happened at the argument

    Justice Alito questioned if the officer's observation of the driving was the real problem.

    Justice Kennedy asked what happens under the driver's view after the stop ends.

    Justice Scalia asked if the driver requested suppression of the fruit of the stop.

    Justice Ginsburg asked if any case suppressed information lawfully in government possession.

    Read the official transcript for this argument · Official argument details

    Sources used for this argument breakdown

A citizen's guide to the whole case

What this case is about

This case tests the reach of the exclusionary rule. It asks if police must discard lawful records found during an illegal stop.

Official sources for this section

How the case got here

The Supreme Court heard oral argument in this case on March 21, 2011.

Official sources for this section

What each side wants

New York wants to use the DMV records to prove the driver had a suspended license.

The driver wants the court to throw out the DMV records because the stop was illegal.

Official sources for this section

What each side says

New York argues the records were lawfully in state possession before the stop occurred.

The driver argues the stop violated the Fourth Amendment, so all resulting evidence is tainted.

Official sources for this section

What the justices asked

Justice Alito asked if the real issue is the officer's observation of the driving.

Justice Kennedy asked what happens under the driver's view after the stop ends.

Official sources for this section

Why it matters

This dispute defines the limits of the exclusionary rule. It determines whether lawful records survive an illegal police stop. The outcome shapes future traffic stop investigations nationwide.

Official sources for this section

What happens next

This article currently covers the argument record. Use the official docket link for later case activity.

Official sources for this section

Official Court provenance

Official docket and case history · Official Supreme Court oral-argument detail page

Title and summary sources

Revision history

  1. Revision 1 · Official Transcript ·

    Correction: Rewritten to the concise citizen-facing editorial standard.

  2. Revision 2 · Official Transcript ·

    Correction: Migrated to the dated official Court activity contract without model use.

Download this sanitized case as JSON