October Term 2012 · Docket 11-1085
Can a judge decide materiality before certifying a securities class action?
Amgen argues that materiality is an individual issue. Plaintiffs claim it is a common question for the whole class.
Showing 521–540 of 1389 cases, newest official Court activity first.
October Term 2012 · Docket 11-1085
Amgen argues that materiality is an individual issue. Plaintiffs claim it is a common question for the whole class.
October Term 2012 · Docket 11-864
Comcast disputes the lower court's rejection of its expert evidence on class-wide damages.
October Term 2012 · Docket 11-770
The dispute centers on whether officers may stop a person located on the sidewalk while executing a warrant inside a residence.
October Term 2012 · Docket 11-820
the sides that brought the case seek retroactive application of the Padilla rule. The government argues the rule is new and cannot apply to pending cases.
October Term 2012 · Docket 11-564
Florida argues the sniff is not a search. Jardines claims it is a search requiring a warrant.
October Term 2012 · Docket 11-817
Florida and Harris disagree on whether a dog's alert alone proves probable cause to search a vehicle.
October Term 2012 · Docket 11-1025
Plaintiffs claim a substantial risk of surveillance. The government argues the threat is too speculative.
October Term 2012 · Docket 11-697
The dispute centers on whether the first-sale doctrine applies to copyrighted works manufactured outside the United States.
October Term 2012 · Docket 11-345
Abigail Fisher challenges the University of Texas admissions policy. She claims the plan discriminates against white applicants. The university defends the policy as constitutional.
October Term 2012 · Docket 11-702
The dispute centers on whether a state drug conviction qualifies as an aggravated felony for immigration removal.
October Term 2012 · Docket 10-930
The dispute centers on whether federal courts can impose time limits on state efforts to restore a defendant's competence for post-conviction review.
October Term 2012 · Docket 11-218
the sides that brought the case seek to end indefinite stays. the opposing sides defend the power to pause cases.
October Term 2012 · Docket 11-465
the side that brought the case argues a state court ruling on state law satisfies federal review. the opposing side argues the court must explicitly address the federal claim.
October Term 2012 · Docket 11-597
The dispute centers on whether temporary flooding by the government constitutes a taking under the Fifth Amendment.
October Term 2012 · Docket 11-184
the sides that brought the case seek district court review of mixed civil service and discrimination claims. The government argues only discrimination claims belong in district court.
October Term 2012 · Docket 11-192
The dispute centers on whether the FLSA allows workers to sue the government for back pay under the Tucker Act.
October Term 2012 · Docket 10-1491
Nigerian plaintiffs sue a Dutch and English company for aiding Nigerian officials. The company argues the conduct occurred entirely outside the United States.
October Term 2012 · Docket 11-626
The dispute centers on whether a houseboat permanently moored in a marina qualifies as a vessel for federal jurisdiction.
October Term 2011 · Docket 11-182
Arizona claims federal law allows state police to check immigration status. The United States argues this power belongs only to federal agencies.
October Term 2011 · Docket 11-246
A private citizen claims the federal government violated the law by placing land into tribal trust. The tribe argues the citizen lacks legal standing to challenge that action.