October Term 2012 · Docket 11-702

Does a state drug conviction count as an aggravated felony for removal?

The dispute centers on whether a state drug conviction qualifies as an aggravated felony for immigration removal.

Official caption
Moncrieffe v. Holder
Latest argument session
Latest official Court activity
Latest verified event
Argued
Sources analyzed through
Official Transcript

Verified source milestones

  1. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.
  2. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.

The arguments, in order

This case may have been argued more than once. Each entry below uses that session's official transcript. Later arguments do not erase earlier ones.

  1. Argument 1 ·

    What happened at the argument

    the side that brought the case argued the state law lacks specific quantity or payment requirements.

    The government argued the state law broadly covers drug distribution activities.

    questions_asked_by_justices

    Read the official transcript for this argument · Official argument details

    Sources used for this argument breakdown

A citizen's guide to the whole case

What this case is about

The case asks if a state drug conviction counts as an aggravated felony for removal.

Official sources for this section

How the case got here

The Supreme Court heard oral argument in this case on October 10, 2012.

Official sources for this section

What each side wants

the side that brought the case wants the conviction to avoid aggravated felony status.

The government wants the conviction to remain an aggravated felony.

Official sources for this section

What each side says

the side that brought the case argues the state law does not require large amounts or payment.

The government argues the state law covers all drug distribution.

Official sources for this section

What the justices asked

Justice Breyer asked about the intent to distribute under federal law.

Justice Sotomayor asked if an immigration judge must ignore a guilty plea admission.

Official sources for this section

Why it matters

This case defines the scope of aggravated felony status for state drug convictions.

Official sources for this section

What happens next

This article currently covers the argument record. Use the official docket link for later case activity.

Official sources for this section

Official Court provenance

Official docket and case history · Official Supreme Court oral-argument detail page

Title and summary sources

Revision history

  1. Revision 1 · Official Transcript ·

    Correction: Rewritten to the concise citizen-facing editorial standard.

  2. Revision 2 · Official Transcript ·

    Correction: Migrated to the dated official Court activity contract without model use.

Download this sanitized case as JSON