Showing 381–400 of 1389 cases, newest official Court activity first.
October Term 2014 · Docket 13-895
Alabama drew new legislative maps using strict racial targets. Plaintiffs claim this violates the Constitution. The state argues it acted to prevent vote dilution.
October Term 2014 · Docket 13-1010
Employers and retirees dispute whether silent contract language creates a permanent right to health coverage.
October Term 2014 · Docket 13-975
T-Mobile argues local denials must include separate written reasons. The city argues the letter suffices.
October Term 2014 · Docket 13-7451
Prosecutors argue a dead fish is a tangible object. The defendant argues the law only covers information storage devices.
October Term 2014 · Docket 13-894
The dispute centers on whether a whistleblower law requires specific regulations to protect security data.
October Term 2014 · Docket 13-435
Investors sue over false beliefs in a prospectus. The company argues only the belief matters.
October Term 2014 · Docket 13-628
A citizen seeks a passport listing Jerusalem as Israel's capital. The government claims this power belongs solely to the President.
October Term 2014 · Docket 13-854
Teva and Sandoz dispute whether appellate courts must defer to trial judges on factual findings during patent claim construction.
October Term 2014 · Docket 126 ORIG.
Kansas and Nebraska dispute whether a court can fix a water-sharing formula that produces unanticipated allocations.
October Term 2014 · Docket 13-534
The dispute centers on whether a state dental board's enforcement of cease-and-desist orders against non-licensed hygienists violates federal antitrust law.
October Term 2014 · Docket 13-433
Warehouse workers seek pay for mandatory security checks. Employers argue these checks are non-compensable.
October Term 2014 · Docket 13-517
The dispute centers on whether a juror's false statement about their ability to judge damages fairly requires a new trial.
October Term 2014 · Docket 13-6827
A prisoner seeks to grow a beard for religious reasons. Arkansas claims this rule threatens prison safety.
October Term 2014 · Docket 13-719
the sides that brought the case argue a district court wrongly demanded evidence to accept a case removal. the opposing sides claim the court acted within its authority.
October Term 2014 · Docket 13-604
North Carolina argues that a police officer’s reasonable error about the law justifies a stop. The driver argues that such mistakes violate the Fourth Amendment.
October Term 2013 · Docket 12-786
Limelight argues that inducing infringement requires direct infringement. Akamai argues that inducement liability exists without it.
October Term 2013 · Docket 13-132
The dispute centers on whether officers may search a phone found on an arrestee without a warrant.
October Term 2013 · Docket 13-212
The government seeks a broad search right. The defendant demands a warrant for digital data.
October Term 2013 · Docket 13-369
The parties dispute whether a patent claim is definite when it permits two reasonable interpretations of its scope.
October Term 2013 · Docket 13-483
A fired employee claims retaliation for grand jury testimony. His employer argues the speech falls within his job duties.