October Term 2013 · Docket 13-132

Can police search a phone without a warrant?

The dispute centers on whether officers may search a phone found on an arrestee without a warrant.

Official caption
Riley v. California
Latest argument session
Latest official Court activity
Latest verified event
Argued
Sources analyzed through
Official Transcript

Verified source milestones

  1. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.
  2. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.

The arguments, in order

This case may have been argued more than once. Each entry below uses that session's official transcript. Later arguments do not erase earlier ones.

  1. Argument 1 ·

    What happened at the argument

    Mr. Fisher argued the Fourth Amendment applies here.

    Justice Kennedy asked about gathering evidence from a gun.

    Justice Alito compared phone photos to billfold photos.

    Mr. Dreeben explained the categorical Robinson rule.

    Read the official transcript for this argument · Official argument details

    Sources used for this argument breakdown

A citizen's guide to the whole case

What this case is about

This case tests the Fourth Amendment. It applies to a new factual circumstance. The core protection faces a digital device.

Official sources for this section

How the case got here

The Supreme Court heard oral argument in this case on April 29, 2014.

Official sources for this section

What each side wants

the side that brought the case wants a warrant requirement for phones.

The state wants to search phones without a warrant.

Official sources for this section

What each side says

the side that brought the case argues phones hold vast private data.

The state argues phones are like physical objects.

Official sources for this section

What the justices asked

Justice Kennedy asked about taking gun fingerprints.

Justice Alito asked about photos in a billfold.

Official sources for this section

Why it matters

This defines privacy rights in the digital age. It sets rules for police searches. It protects personal data from state access.

Official sources for this section

What happens next

This article currently covers the argument record. Use the official docket link for later case activity.

Official sources for this section

Official Court provenance

Official docket and case history · Official Supreme Court oral-argument detail page

Title and summary sources

Revision history

  1. Revision 1 · Official Transcript ·

    Correction: Rewritten to the concise citizen-facing editorial standard.

  2. Revision 2 · Official Transcript ·

    Correction: Migrated to the dated official Court activity contract without model use.

Download this sanitized case as JSON