October Term 2024 · Docket 23-1324
Does a judge's exhaustion ruling bind a later jury?
Prisoners argue exhaustion is a legal question for judges. States argue it involves facts for juries.
Browse every published brief without JavaScript.
Showing 81–100 of 1712 cases, newest official Court activity first.
October Term 2024 · Docket 23-1324
Prisoners argue exhaustion is a legal question for judges. States argue it involves facts for juries.
October Term 2024 · Docket 23-7483
The dispute centers on whether courts may consider the seriousness of a crime when deciding to revoke supervised release.
October Term 2024 · Docket 23-7809
A Texas prisoner argues a court order declaring state DNA rules unconstitutional fixes his lack of access to testing. The state argues the order does not fix that specific injury.
October Term 2024 · Docket 23-1007
the sides that brought the case seek to sue Cornell over a service provider deal. Cornell argues the law requires proof of specific harm.
October Term 2024 · Docket 23-1239
The dispute centers on whether a court must consider the entire sequence of events or only the final moment of threat when judging police force.
October Term 2024 · Docket 23-1187
The dispute centers on whether the Tobacco Control Act grants retailers standing to challenge FDA marketing denials.
October Term 2024 · Docket 23-1226
McLaughlin Chiropractic wants to challenge an agency order in district court. McKesson argues only appellate courts can review it.
October Term 2024 · Docket 23-1122
the sides that brought the case claim the law burdens adult speech. Texas argues it protects minors.
October Term 2024 · Docket 23-1095
The dispute centers on whether Section 1014 covers statements that are technically true but convey an untrue message.
October Term 2024 · Docket 23-971
The dispute centers on whether a party can use a court rule to reopen a dismissed case and attack an arbitration award.
October Term 2024 · Docket 23-1002
the sides that brought the case seek retroactive sentence reductions. The government argues the law excludes them.
October Term 2024 · Docket 23-997
Stanley argues the ADA covers her denied benefits. The City argues the law only protects current employees.
October Term 2024 · Docket 24-656
TikTok argues the law bans its speech. The government says the law protects national security.
October Term 2024 · Docket 23-900
Dewberry Group seeks to stop courts from counting affiliate profits. Dewberry Engineers argues courts must count them.
October Term 2024 · Docket 23-975
A coalition argues the law mandates studying all foreseeable effects. The county argues agencies should focus on direct impacts.
October Term 2024 · Docket 23-861
The dispute centers on whether the word during limits pay to specific contingency operations or covers all active duty calls.
October Term 2024 · Docket 23-909
the sides that brought the case argue property fraud statutes require harm to traditional property interests. The government argues the focus is on the transaction's materiality.
October Term 2024 · Docket 23-477
Tennessee argues its law targets risky medical procedures. The federal government argues the law discriminates based on sex.
October Term 2024 · Docket 23-867
Plaintiffs seek to recover Holocaust-era property from Hungary. Hungary claims sovereign immunity blocks the suit.
October Term 2024 · Docket 23-1038
The FDA demands new tobacco products prove they help smokers quit. Manufacturers argue this rule contradicts prior agency guidance.