October Term 2006 · Docket 05-547

Does a state drug crime count as a federal aggravated felony?

the sides that brought the case argue state drug crimes are not federal aggravated felonies. The government disagrees.

Official caption
Lopez v. Gonzales
Latest argument session
Latest official Court activity
Latest verified event
Argued
Sources analyzed through
Official Transcript

Verified source milestones

  1. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.

The arguments, in order

This case may have been argued more than once. Each entry below uses that session's official transcript. Later arguments do not erase earlier ones.

  1. Argument 1 ·

    What happened at the argument

    Mr. Kneedler stated two requirements for a state drug offense to be an aggravated felony.

    He said the conduct must be punishable under federal law and be a felony.

    Mr. Long defined a drug-trafficking crime as a felony punishable under federal statutes.

    He emphasized that the term punishable is a key term in the definition.

    Read the official transcript for this argument · Official argument details

    Sources used for this argument breakdown

A citizen's guide to the whole case

What this case is about

The case asks if state drug crimes are federal aggravated felonies. This status affects immigration removal.

Official sources for this section

How the case got here

The Supreme Court heard oral argument in this case on October 3, 2006.

Official sources for this section

What each side wants

the sides that brought the case want the state drug crime excluded from federal aggravated felony status.

The government wants the state drug crime included as a federal aggravated felony.

Official sources for this section

What each side says

the sides that brought the case argue the state crime lacks the specific federal statutory elements.

The government argues the state crime matches the federal definition of a drug trafficking crime.

Official sources for this section

What the justices asked

Justice Alito asked how the phrase illicit trafficking adds meaning to the statute.

Justice Alito asked if any state trafficking offenses fall outside the federal definition.

Official sources for this section

Why it matters

This dispute determines if state drug convictions trigger federal immigration penalties. It defines the scope of federal aggravated felony status.

Official sources for this section

What happens next

This article currently covers the argument record. Use the official docket link for later case activity.

Official sources for this section

Official Court provenance

Official docket and case history · Official Supreme Court oral-argument detail page

Title and summary sources

Revision history

  1. Revision 1 · Official Transcript ·

    Correction: Rewritten to the concise citizen-facing editorial standard.

  2. Revision 2 · Official Transcript ·

    Correction: Migrated to the dated official Court activity contract without model use.

Download this sanitized case as JSON