Showing 1261–1280 of 1389 cases, newest official Court activity first.
October Term 2001 · Docket 01-394
The dispute centers on whether a qualified immunity defense applies when officials allegedly block a citizen from filing a lawsuit.
October Term 2001 · Docket 00-1406
Chevron argues it must exclude a worker with hepatitis C to protect others. Echazabal claims the ADA bans such exclusions.
October Term 2001 · Docket 00-1737
The Watchtower Bible Society challenges a local ordinance that requires residents to register before soliciting on private property.
October Term 2001 · Docket 01-344
the sides that brought the case argue federal law bans unsafe drug sales. the opposing sides claim states can waive these rules for mail-order pharmacies.
October Term 2001 · Docket 01-298
Paul Lapides argues that Georgia waived its immunity by removing a case to federal court. Georgia argues that only its legislature can waive that immunity.
October Term 2001 · Docket 01-46
The Federal Maritime Commission argues that states lack immunity from executive branch adjudication. South Carolina claims sovereign immunity blocks private suits in federal administrative forums.
October Term 2001 · Docket 00-1751
Ohio officials defend a scholarship program. Opponents claim it funds religious schools.
October Term 2001 · Docket 00-8452
Daryl Atkins challenges Virginia's execution order. He argues the Eighth Amendment bans this practice. Virginia defends its right to carry out the sentence.
October Term 2001 · Docket 00-1214
Alabama argues it can imprison a defendant without a lawyer if they pay fines. The defendant argues this violates the Sixth Amendment right to counsel.
October Term 2001 · Docket 00-1770
HUD argues federal law mandates eviction for any drug crime in a unit. Rucker argues this ignores the specific tenant's innocence.
October Term 2001 · Docket 00-1021
Rush Prudential HMO argues federal law preempts state review. Moran argues Illinois law protects her benefits.
October Term 2001 · Docket 00-1937
Cleveland Walton argues the law requires a five-month wait. The government says the statute does not mandate this delay.
October Term 2001 · Docket 00-1595
The dispute centers on whether immigration laws bar an employer from paying back wages to a worker who lacked legal status.
October Term 2001 · Docket 00-1853
The dispute centers on whether a complaint must allege a specific inference of discrimination to survive a motion to dismiss.
October Term 2001 · Docket 00-853
The dispute centers on whether the Prison Litigation Reform Act mandates exhaustion of administrative remedies for excessive force claims.
October Term 2001 · Docket 00-1567
the sides that brought the case seek to erase old tax debts. The government argues these claims survive bankruptcy.
October Term 2001 · Docket 00-1614
Amtrak argues a strict deadline bars old claims. Morgan argues ongoing harm keeps claims alive.
October Term 2001 · Docket 00-1072
A college argues a job bias complaint failed because it lacked a sworn statement. The complainant argues a later sworn statement fixes the error.
October Term 2001 · Docket 00-1543
Festo seeks to limit the doctrine of equivalents. Shoketsu argues the doctrine remains broad.
October Term 2001 · Docket 00-1167
Landowners argue a temporary ban on development permanently deprived them of property rights. The agency argues the ban served a valid public purpose.