October Term 2022 · Docket 22-138
Does prosecuting true threats require proof of specific intent?
The dispute centers on whether criminalizing true threats requires proof that the speaker intended to threaten.
Browse every published brief without JavaScript.
Showing 181–200 of 1712 cases, newest official Court activity first.
October Term 2022 · Docket 22-138
The dispute centers on whether criminalizing true threats requires proof that the speaker intended to threaten.
October Term 2022 · Docket 21-1326
Relators seek damages for SuperValu's pricing claims. SuperValu argues the law lacked a clear standard.
October Term 2022 · Docket 22-174
The dispute centers on whether a minor inconvenience to an employer blocks a religious accommodation under federal law.
October Term 2022 · Docket 22-200
Slack argues Section 11 covers only registered shares. Pirani argues it covers all shares in the offering.
October Term 2022 · Docket 22-23
The dispute centers on whether federal law defines obstruction of justice as interference with any investigation or only with a currently active legal proceeding.
October Term 2022 · Docket 21-1599
The dispute centers on whether the IRS can bypass judicial review to obtain a law firm's records for a tax collection effort.
October Term 2022 · Docket 22-196
The dispute centers on whether a judge's instruction to ignore a co-defendant's confession satisfies the Sixth Amendment when that confession explicitly names the defendant.
October Term 2022 · Docket 21-1576
the side that brought the case seeks immunity from reprosecution after a venue error. The government argues the error allows a new trial.
October Term 2022 · Docket 22-49
The dispute centers on whether a specific statute mandates consecutive prison terms for firearm offenses.
October Term 2022 · Docket 21-757
Amgen argues its broad patent claim is valid because it provides a general roadmap. Sanofi argues the claim is invalid because it covers antibodies that are difficult to create.
October Term 2022 · Docket 22-179
The government argues the law targets fraud. Hansen argues it punishes protected speech.
October Term 2022 · Docket 22-148
Jack Daniel's claims a dog toy parodies its brand. VIP Products argues the First Amendment protects that speech.
October Term 2022 · Docket 21-1043
Abitron claims Hetronic infringed its U.S. trademarks in Europe. Hetronic argues the law does not apply to foreign conduct.
October Term 2022 · Docket 22-105
Coinbase argues that appealing an arbitration order pauses the main lawsuit. Bielski argues that the appeal does not pause the main lawsuit.
October Term 2022 · Docket 21-1484
The Navajo Nation claims a federal right to water. Arizona disputes this claim.
October Term 2022 · Docket 156 ORIG.
New York claims the 1953 compact bans unilateral exit. New Jersey argues silence allows withdrawal.
October Term 2022 · Docket 22-506
The federal government claims pandemic laws let it erase student debt. Nebraska argues Congress must pass a specific law first.
October Term 2022 · Docket 22-535
The Department of Education argues the HEROES Act allows loan forgiveness. Brown and Taylor argue it does not.
October Term 2022 · Docket 21-1496
Twitter argues it cannot face liability for user crimes. Plaintiffs claim the platform knowingly aided terrorists.
October Term 2022 · Docket 21-1333
the sides that brought the case argue Google's design choices caused harm. the opposing sides claim the statute bars all such claims.