October Term 2022 · Docket 21-1333

Does Section 230 shield platforms from liability for their own design choices?

the sides that brought the case argue Google's design choices caused harm. the opposing sides claim the statute bars all such claims.

Official caption
Gonzalez v. Google LLC
Latest argument session
Latest official Court activity
Latest verified event
Decided
Sources analyzed through
Post Opinion

Verified source milestones

  1. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.
  2. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.
  3. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.
  4. — An official Court opinion was verified.

The arguments, in order

This case may have been argued more than once. Each entry below uses that session's official transcript. Later arguments do not erase earlier ones.

  1. Argument 1 ·

    What happened at the argument

    Mr. Schnapper argued Section 230 distinguishes third-party content from company conduct.

    Ms. Blatt argued the statute bars claims when harm flows from third-party information.

    Justice Roberts noted platforms are responsible for item selection, not content.

    Read the official transcript for this argument · Official argument details

    Sources used for this argument breakdown

A citizen's guide to the whole case

What this case is about

This case tests the scope of Section 230(c)(1). the sides that brought the case seek liability for platform design. the opposing sides seek immunity for all content-related claims.

Official sources for this section

How the case got here

The Supreme Court heard oral argument in this case on February 21, 2023.

Official sources for this section

What each side wants

the sides that brought the case want the Court to allow liability for platform design choices.

the opposing sides want the Court to bar all claims based on third-party content.

Official sources for this section

What each side says

the sides that brought the case argue the statute distinguishes between third-party content and company conduct.

the opposing sides argue the statute bars claims when harm flows from third-party information.

Official sources for this section

What the justices asked

Justice Alito asked whether specific actions constitute publishing.

Justice Alito questioned where the line between content and conduct is drawn.

Official sources for this section

Why it matters

The outcome defines platform liability for design choices. It shapes user safety and speech regulation online.

Official sources for this section

What happens next

This article currently covers the argument record. Use the official docket link for later case activity.

Official sources for this section

Official Court provenance

Official docket and case history · Official Supreme Court oral-argument detail page

Verified official opinions and orders

Title and summary sources

Revision history

  1. Revision 1 · Post Opinion ·

    Correction: Rewritten to the concise citizen-facing editorial standard.

  2. Revision 2 · Post Opinion ·

    Correction: Migrated to the dated official Court activity contract without model use.

Download this sanitized case as JSON