Showing 61–73 of 73 cases, newest official Court activity first.
October Term 2009 · Docket 08-351
the sides that brought the case argue Illinois forfeits property without a pre-seizure hearing. the opposing sides claim the current process satisfies constitutional requirements.
October Term 2009 · Docket 08-970
The dispute centers on whether a district court may increase a standard fee award to reward exceptional legal performance.
October Term 2009 · Docket 08-651
The dispute centers on whether criminal lawyers must advise clients about immigration consequences when recommending a guilty plea.
October Term 2009 · Docket 08-724
The dispute centers on whether Ohio's highest court unreasonably applied federal standards when it denied a death row inmate's appeal.
October Term 2009 · Docket 138 ORIG.
South Carolina and North Carolina fight over Catawba River water. Private entities want to join the case.
October Term 2009 · Docket 08-103
the sides that brought the case seek to enforce a settlement covering unregistered works. the opposing sides argue the registration requirement blocks such claims.
October Term 2009 · Docket 08-472
The dispute centers on whether transferring a cross from public to private land satisfies the Establishment Clause.
October Term 2009 · Docket 08-604
Union Pacific disputes a board award that ignored a statutory conference requirement.
October Term 2009 · Docket 08-6925
The dispute centers on whether a state battery conviction qualifies as a violent felony under federal law.
October Term 2009 · Docket 08-728
The dispute centers on whether time spent preparing pretrial motions automatically stops the Speedy Trial Act clock.
October Term 2009 · Docket 08-769
The government argues the law targets harmful conduct. The defendant argues it bans protected speech.
October Term 2009 · Docket 08-678
Mohawk Industries argues that immediate appeals prevent inconsistent rulings on privilege. Carpenter contends that finality rules must block such appeals.
October Term 2009 · Docket 08-680
Police asked a prisoner to talk again after a short break. He refused. The state wants that later statement admitted.