October Term 2006 · Docket 05-1284
Can a state lawsuit against a regulated company move to federal court?
The dispute centers on whether federal regulations allow a company to remove a state tort claim to federal court.
Showing 1–20 of 65 cases, newest official Court activity first.
October Term 2006 · Docket 05-1284
The dispute centers on whether federal regulations allow a company to remove a state tort claim to federal court.
October Term 2006 · Docket 06-969
The FEC argues issue ads must follow campaign rules. Wisconsin Right to Life claims this bans protected speech.
October Term 2006 · Docket 05-1448
Crown Vantage wants to end over-funded pension plans without merging them. The union argues the law requires considering a merger first.
October Term 2006 · Docket 06-134
India's UN mission argues tax liens do not create real property rights. New York City claims the liens trigger jurisdiction.
October Term 2006 · Docket 06-618
A former staffer claims his employer violated labor laws. The Senator argues Congress cannot be sued for such acts.
October Term 2006 · Docket 06-376
the sides that brought the case seek district court review. The government demands exclusive Tax Court jurisdiction.
October Term 2006 · Docket 06-562
The dispute centers on whether a party responsible for pollution can use a specific statute to recover costs from other responsible parties.
October Term 2006 · Docket 06-8120
The dispute centers on whether a passenger is legally seized during a routine traffic stop.
October Term 2006 · Docket 06-427
Brentwood Academy claims the TSSAA violated its First Amendment rights by banning recruiting.
October Term 2006 · Docket 06-413
the sides that brought the case seek to keep a state court's factual finding. the opposing sides want a federal court to overturn that finding.
October Term 2006 · Docket 06-531
the sides that brought the case seek fees after a preliminary injunction. the opposing sides argue the injunction does not prove a federal law violation.
October Term 2006 · Docket 05-85
The dispute centers on whether federal courts of appeals can review a district court's remand order when the remand rests on jurisdictional grounds rather than procedural defects.
October Term 2006 · Docket 06-593
the sides that brought the case argue the statute exempts all home-care workers. the opposing sides claim the exemption covers only direct hires.
October Term 2006 · Docket 06-484
The parties dispute whether courts must apply a higher standard of proof at the pleading stage than at trial.
October Term 2006 · Docket 05-1157
Investors sue brokers over fee structures. Brokers claim federal regulation blocks these claims.
October Term 2006 · Docket 06-480
Leegin argues the per se rule is outdated. PSKS argues it prevents harmful price fixing.
October Term 2006 · Docket 06-5306
The dispute centers on whether a late appeal filing is invalid because the deadline is strict.
October Term 2006 · Docket 06-313
The dispute centers on whether a prosecutor's closing argument improperly pressured the jury to return a death verdict.
October Term 2006 · Docket 06-5247
the side that brought the case seeks the direct review standard for constitutional errors. the opposing side argues for the stricter collateral review standard.
October Term 2006 · Docket 06-219
A rancher claims federal agents harassed him. The government says he lacks a legal remedy.