Status: Decided

Showing 1–20 of 321 cases, newest official Court activity first.

  1. October Term 2025 · Docket 24-889

    Can a Generic Drug Maker's Public Statements Count as Patent Infringement?

    Amarin Pharma sued Hikma Pharmaceuticals, claiming Hikma's public statements encouraged doctors to infringe Amarin's patent on its drug Vascepa. A district court threw out the complaint. The Supreme Court must decide whether those statements can count as actively inducing patent infringement.

    Case
    Hikma Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. v. Amarin Pharma, Inc.
    Latest official Court activity
    Latest verified event
    Decided
    Sources analyzed through
    Post Opinion
  2. October Term 2025 · Docket 24-856

    Can a U.S. Company Be Sued for Helping Torture Committed Abroad?

    People suing Cisco say it knowingly helped Chinese officials persecute Falun Gong practitioners from the United States. The Supreme Court must decide whether federal law allows lawsuits against a company for helping torture happen abroad, even when the company did not carry out the abuse itself.

    Case
    Cisco Systems v. Doe I
    Latest official Court activity
    Latest verified event
    Decided
    Sources analyzed through
    Post Opinion
  3. October Term 2025 · Docket 24-1068

    Does federal pesticide law block a state lawsuit demanding a stronger cancer warning?

    Monsanto says its weed killer's EPA-approved label shields it from a Missouri cancer lawsuit. The person suing says federal approval is no excuse, and the Supreme Court must decide which argument wins.

    Case
    Monsanto Co. v. Durnell
    Latest official Court activity
    Latest verified event
    Decided
    Sources analyzed through
    Post Opinion
  4. October Term 2025 · Docket 25-112

    Did a Geofence Warrant Searching Google Location Data Violate the Fourth Amendment?

    Okello Chatrie says a warrant that let police search Google's location records around a bank robbery broke Fourth Amendment rules. The United States says the search was lawful and asks the Court to uphold it.

    Case
    Chatrie v. United States
    Latest official Court activity
    Latest verified event
    Decided
    Sources analyzed through
    Post Opinion
  5. October Term 2025 · Docket 25-365

    Does the Constitution Grant Citizenship to Every Child Born in the United States?

    The Supreme Court must decide whether the Fourteenth Amendment's Citizenship Clause gives automatic citizenship to babies born here to temporary visitors or undocumented parents. Or whether the government can exclude them.

    Case
    Trump, President of U.S. v. Barbara
    Latest official Court activity
    Latest verified event
    Decided
    Sources analyzed through
    Post Opinion
  6. October Term 2025 · Docket 25-5146

    Where Does a Fraud Crime Happen When a False Record Is Made on a Computer?

    Abouammo v. United States asks the Supreme Court to decide where a federal fraud crime counts as happening. The dispute is whether a trial can take place in San Francisco when the person created a false record elsewhere. The answer decides where the trial can occur.

    Case
    Abouammo v. United States
    Latest official Court activity
    Latest verified event
    Decided
    Sources analyzed through
    Post Opinion
  7. October Term 2025 · Docket 25-83

    Does a Federal Court Have Power to Confirm an Arbitration Award After Dismissing the Underlying Case?

    Adrian Jules says the court lacked power to confirm a money award against him. Andre Balazs Properties says the court should enter judgment on the award and dismiss the case. The Supreme Court heard argument on March 30, 2026.

    Case
    Jules v. Andre Balazs Properties
    Latest official Court activity
    Latest verified event
    Decided
    Sources analyzed through
    Post Opinion
  8. October Term 2025 · Docket 24-935

    Does the federal labor law exemption cover bread delivery drivers on the last leg of an interstate trip?

    Flowers Foods says its bread delivery driver, Angelo Brock, is not exempt from federal wage rules because he never crossed a state line. Brock says the exemption covers drivers on the last leg of an interstate journey. The Supreme Court heard argument on March 25, 2026.

    Case
    Flowers Foods, Inc. v. Brock
    Latest official Court activity
    Latest verified event
    Decided
    Sources analyzed through
    Post Opinion
  9. October Term 2025 · Docket 25-5

    Does the immigration law protect people who reach the border, or only those already inside the United States?

    The federal government limits how many people can approach the border to ask for protection. Al Otro Lado says that policy breaks federal law. The Supreme Court must decide what the word arrives means in the immigration statute.

    Case
    Noem, Sec. of Homeland v. Al Otro Lado
    Latest official Court activity
    Latest verified event
    Decided
    Sources analyzed through
    Post Opinion
  10. October Term 2025 · Docket 25-6

    When Does Judicial Estoppel Apply to a Bankruptcy Debtor Who Left an Asset Off a Form?

    Keathley says the Fifth Circuit applies too strict a presumption of intent when a debtor omits an asset. Buddy Ayers Construction defends the ruling, saying finality and court integrity justify it. The United States, as a friend of the court, asks the Court to vacate and send the case back for a broader fairness review.

    Case
    Keathley v. Buddy Ayers Construction, Inc.
    Latest official Court activity
    Latest verified event
    Decided
    Sources analyzed through
    Post Opinion
  11. October Term 2025 · Docket 24-1260

    Can Mississippi count mail ballots received after Election Day?

    The case asks what federal Election Day law requires when a timely mailed ballot arrives later.

    Case
    Watson v. RNC
    Latest official Court activity
    Latest verified event
    Decided
    Sources analyzed through
    Post Opinion
  12. October Term 2025 · Docket 24-1238

    Does federal law shield freight brokers from state lawsuits?

    A trucking crash case asks whether federal transportation law blocks negligence claims against companies that select carriers.

    Case
    Montgomery v. Caribe Transport II, LLC
    Latest official Court activity
    Latest verified event
    Decided
    Sources analyzed through
    Post Opinion
  13. October Term 2025 · Docket 24-1063

    Can a Guilty Plea's Appeal Waiver Block a Challenge to a Clearly Unlawful Sentence?

    Munson P. Hunter, III pleaded guilty under a deal that waived his right to appeal his sentence. He says contract law can excuse that waiver when a sentence is clearly wrong. The United States says a valid waiver sticks. The Supreme Court heard argument on March 3, 2026, and has not ruled.

    Case
    Hunter v. United States
    Latest official Court activity
    Latest verified event
    Decided
    Sources analyzed through
    Post Opinion
  14. October Term 2025 · Docket 24-1234

    Can the federal gun ban apply to someone who uses illegal drugs regularly?

    United States v. Hemani asks whether the federal ban on gun possession by unlawful drug users can constitutionally apply to Ali Danial Hemani. The government defends the charge. Hemani argues the law cannot be applied to him.

    Case
    United States v. Hemani
    Latest official Court activity
    Latest verified event
    Decided
    Sources analyzed through
    Post Opinion
  15. October Term 2025 · Docket 25-95

    When a County Keeps a Home's Extra Sale Money After a Tax Foreclosure. Does the Constitution Require the Homeowner to Get the Home's Full Market Value or Only the Leftover Amount?

    A Michigan homeowner lost his house over unpaid taxes. The county sold it and kept the entire sale price. The homeowner says the Constitution entitles him to more than the small surplus left after the debt.

    Case
    Pung v. Isabella County
    Latest official Court activity
    Latest verified event
    Decided
    Sources analyzed through
    Post Opinion
  16. October Term 2025 · Docket 24-783

    Can Federal Courts Excuse a Missed Deadline for Moving a Case to Federal Court?

    Enbridge Energy missed the 30-day deadline for moving its pipeline dispute from Michigan state court to federal court. The company asks the Supreme Court to let federal courts use equitable powers to excuse that delay. Michigan's attorney general says Congress set a mandatory deadline that courts cannot override.

    Case
    Enbridge Energy, LP v. Nessel
    Latest official Court activity
    Latest verified event
    Decided
    Sources analyzed through
    Post Opinion
  17. October Term 2025 · Docket 24-983

    Does Paying Cuba to Use Seized Docks Count as Trafficking in Confiscated Property?

    Havana Docks built docks in Cuba. The Cuban government seized them in 1960 without payment. Royal Caribbean later paid Cuba to use those docks. The dispute is whether that payment constitutes trafficking in confiscated property.

    Case
    Havana Docks Corp. v. Royal Caribbean Cruises
    Latest official Court activity
    Latest verified event
    Decided
    Sources analyzed through
    Post Opinion