October Term 2003 · Docket 02-682
Does a telecom monopoly owe rivals discounted asset access under antitrust law?
Verizon argues the Telecommunications Act replaces antitrust duties. Trinko claims Verizon breached interconnection agreements.
Latest case briefs — page 75
Browse every published brief without JavaScript.
Showing 1481–1500 of 1712 cases, newest official Court activity first.
October Term 2003 · Docket 02-763
Can a claimant be disabled if they can do other work but not their previous job?
The dispute centers on whether a person qualifies for disability benefits when they cannot perform their past job but can perform other existing work.
October Term 2003 · Docket 02-658
Can EPA override Alaska's air permit decisions?
Alaska claims EPA illegally overrode its local air permit choices.
October Term 2003 · Docket 02-749
Does a no-rehire policy for misconduct violate the ADA?
Raytheon argues its no-rehire rule for misconduct is neutral. Hernandez claims it discriminates against disabled workers.
October Term 2003 · Docket 02-628
Can sovereign immunity block enforcement of a federal consent decree?
the sides that brought the case seek to enforce a consent decree. the opposing sides claim sovereign immunity bars that enforcement.
October Term 2003 · Docket 129 ORIG.
Who regulates structures on the Potomac River?
Virginia and Maryland dispute who controls riverfront construction.
October Term 2002 · Docket 02-1674
Can Congress restrict party fundraising?
Lawmakers challenge federal limits on political party money.
October Term 2002 · Docket 02-306
Does the National Bank Act bar state-law usury claims against national banks?
A borrower argues state law allows a usury claim. The bank argues federal law provides the only remedy.
October Term 2002 · Docket 02-371
Can a city ban loitering without violating free speech rights?
Richmond banned loitering to stop drug sales. Hicks argues this law targets protected speech.
October Term 2002 · Docket 02-182
Does Georgia's redistricting plan violate federal voting rights laws?
Georgia argues its new map complies with federal law. Opponents claim the plan dilutes Black voting power.
October Term 2002 · Docket 02-695
Can Iowa tax racetracks higher than riverboats?
the sides that brought the case argue Iowa taxes racetracks unfairly. the opposing sides claim the state serves a valid interest.
October Term 2002 · Docket 02-299
Who controls wholesale rates for mothballed units?
Entergy seeks FERC authority over affiliate billing. Louisiana claims state power.
October Term 2002 · Docket 02-469
Must ERISA plans accept treating physician opinions over other medical evidence?
the sides that brought the case argue the Ninth Circuit wrongly forces plans to accept treating physician views. the opposing sides claim this rule protects disabled workers from biased denials.
October Term 2002 · Docket 02-575
Can a state court hear a foreign company's speech case?
Nike argues California lacks jurisdiction over its global speech. Kasky claims the state court has power to judge his claims.
October Term 2002 · Docket 02-722
Does California's Holocaust insurance reporting law violate federal foreign affairs power?
Insurance companies challenge a California law requiring them to report Holocaust-era policies to state officials.
October Term 2002 · Docket 01-950
Does a federal statute exempt state raw milk laws from Commerce Clause review?
Hillside Dairy argues a federal statute exempts California raw milk rules from constitutional scrutiny. Lyons contends the statute does not create such an exemption.
October Term 2002 · Docket 02-634
Can a state court override a federal arbitration agreement to allow class claims?
Green Tree Financial seeks to enforce a contract that bars class arbitration. Bazzle argues state law permits the class action despite the federal statute.
October Term 2002 · Docket 02-524
Can a trial judge change a mid-trial ruling after a party requests reconsideration?
The dispute centers on whether a trial judge may alter a mid-trial ruling after a party seeks reconsideration.
October Term 2002 · Docket 02-679
Does Title VII require proof that gender was the sole cause of an adverse employment decision?
The dispute centers on whether an employer must prove that a protected characteristic was the sole cause of an adverse action to avoid liability.
October Term 2002 · Docket 02-337
Can a defendant move a state court case to federal court based on a federal law claim?
The parties dispute whether a defendant can remove a case to federal court when the plaintiff's claims rely on federal law.