October Term 2023 · Docket 23-175

Can cities ban sleeping outdoors when no shelter beds exist?

Grants Pass wants to enforce camping bans. Johnson argues the Eighth Amendment forbids punishing homelessness when shelter is unavailable.

Official caption
City of Grants Pass v. Johnson
Latest argument session
Latest official Court activity
Latest verified event
Decided
Sources analyzed through
Post Opinion

Verified source milestones

  1. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.
  2. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.
  3. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.
  4. — An official Court opinion was verified.

The arguments, in order

This case may have been argued more than once. Each entry below uses that session's official transcript. Later arguments do not erase earlier ones.

  1. Argument 1 ·

    What happened at the argument

    Ms. Evangelis argued the laws protect public health and safety.

    Mr. Kneedler argued the city cannot criminalize the status of being homeless.

    Ms. Corkran argued the ordinances inflict status-based punishment in effect and purpose.

    Mr. Kneedler conceded that sleeping outside without a place to go defines homelessness.

    Read the official transcript for this argument · Official argument details

    Sources used for this argument breakdown

A citizen's guide to the whole case

What this case is about

The dispute centers on whether the Eighth Amendment bars cities from enforcing camping bans against homeless people when no shelter beds are available.

Official sources for this section

How the case got here

The Supreme Court heard oral argument in this case on April 22, 2024.

Official sources for this section

What each side wants

Grants Pass wants to enforce its camping bans to protect public spaces and health.

Johnson wants the court to strike down the bans as unconstitutional status-based punishment.

Official sources for this section

What each side says

Grants Pass argues the laws target specific conduct, not the status of being homeless.

Johnson argues the laws punish the status of homelessness, which is cruel and unusual.

Official sources for this section

What the justices asked

Justice Thomas asked what specific conduct is involved in this case.

Justice Thomas asked if the case involves repeat offenders or first-time offenders only.

Official sources for this section

Why it matters

This case determines whether cities can ban sleeping outdoors when shelter beds are scarce. It affects public safety and the rights of homeless individuals nationwide.

Official sources for this section

What happens next

This article currently covers the argument record. Use the official docket link for later case activity.

Official sources for this section

Official Court provenance

Official docket and case history · Official Supreme Court oral-argument detail page

Verified official opinions and orders

Title and summary sources

Revision history

  1. Revision 1 · Post Opinion ·

    Correction: Rewritten to the concise citizen-facing editorial standard.

  2. Revision 2 · Post Opinion ·

    Correction: Migrated to the dated official Court activity contract without model use.

Download this sanitized case as JSON