October Term 2022 · Docket 21-707

Can universities use race in admissions?

the sides that brought the case demand strict race neutrality. The university argues race helps assess whole-person diversity.

Official caption
Students for Fair Admissions v. University of NC
Latest argument session
Latest official Court activity
Latest verified event
Argued
Sources analyzed through
Official Transcript

Verified source milestones

  1. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.
  2. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.
  3. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.

The arguments, in order

This case may have been argued more than once. Each entry below uses that session's official transcript. Later arguments do not erase earlier ones.

  1. Argument 1 ·

    What happened at the argument

    Strawbridge argued racial classifications are fundamentally wrong.

    Park argued diversity strengthens the nation despite challenges.

    Hinojosa urged the Court to affirm the Bakke framework.

    Read the official transcript for this argument · Official argument details

    Sources used for this argument breakdown

A citizen's guide to the whole case

What this case is about

Students for Fair Admissions argues racial classifications violate equal protection. The University of North Carolina claims race aids holistic review.

Official sources for this section

How the case got here

The Supreme Court heard oral argument in this case on October 31, 2022.

Official sources for this section

What each side wants

the sides that brought the case want the Court to ban race-based admissions.

The university wants to keep using race in admissions.

Official sources for this section

What each side says

the sides that brought the case argue racial classifications violate equal protection principles.

The university argues race helps evaluate whole-person diversity.

Official sources for this section

What the justices asked

Justice Sotomayor asked how officers assess socioeconomic barriers without race.

Justice Kagan asked why race alone determines impermissible purposes.

Official sources for this section

Why it matters

This case defines the limits of racial preferences in higher education. It shapes access to elite institutions for all students.

Official sources for this section

What happens next

This article currently covers the argument record. Use the official docket link for later case activity.

Official sources for this section

Official Court provenance

Official docket and case history · Official Supreme Court oral-argument detail page

Title and summary sources

Revision history

  1. Revision 1 · Official Transcript ·

    Correction: Rewritten to the concise citizen-facing editorial standard.

  2. Revision 2 · Official Transcript ·

    Correction: Migrated to the dated official Court activity contract without model use.

Download this sanitized case as JSON