October Term 2021 · Docket 20-843

Does New York require a special reason to carry a gun?

the sides that brought the case seek to strike down a permit requirement. the opposing sides defend the state's public safety rules.

Official caption
New York State Rifle & Pistol Assn. v. Bruen
Latest argument session
Latest official Court activity
Latest verified event
Decided
Sources analyzed through
Post Opinion

Verified source milestones

  1. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.
  2. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.
  3. — An official Court opinion was verified.

The arguments, in order

This case may have been argued more than once. Each entry below uses that session's official transcript. Later arguments do not erase earlier ones.

  1. Argument 1 ·

    What happened at the argument

    Ms. Underwood argued English and American law limited public carrying.

    Mr. Clement argued the state fears more firearms in circulation.

    questions_asked_by_justices

    Read the official transcript for this argument · Official argument details

    Sources used for this argument breakdown

A citizen's guide to the whole case

What this case is about

New York law requires a special reason to carry a concealed firearm. the sides that brought the case argue this violates the Second Amendment. the opposing sides argue the state may regulate public safety.

Official sources for this section

How the case got here

The Supreme Court heard oral argument in this case on November 3, 2021.

Official sources for this section

What each side wants

the sides that brought the case want the Court to strike down the permit requirement.

the opposing sides want the Court to uphold the state's regulation.

Official sources for this section

What each side says

the sides that brought the case argue the state cannot demand a special reason to carry.

the opposing sides argue the state may restrict carry to protect safety.

Official sources for this section

What the justices asked

Justice Breyer asked if the state can require good moral character.

Justice Sotomayor asked about historical laws conditioning the right to carry.

Official sources for this section

Why it matters

The outcome defines the scope of public firearm carrying rights. It balances individual self-defense against state public safety powers.

Official sources for this section

What happens next

This article currently covers the argument record. Use the official docket link for later case activity.

Official sources for this section

Official Court provenance

Official docket and case history · Official Supreme Court oral-argument detail page

Verified official opinions and orders

Title and summary sources

Revision history

  1. Revision 1 · Post Opinion ·

    Correction: Rewritten to the concise citizen-facing editorial standard.

  2. Revision 2 · Post Opinion ·

    Correction: Migrated to the dated official Court activity contract without model use.

Download this sanitized case as JSON