October Term 2021 · Docket 20-828

Does the state secrets privilege bar FISA claims?

The FBI seeks dismissal of surveillance claims. Plaintiffs seek damages for alleged unlawful spying.

Official caption
FBI v. Fazaga
Latest argument session
Latest official Court activity
Latest verified event
Decided
Sources analyzed through
Post Opinion

Verified source milestones

  1. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.
  2. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.
  3. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.
  4. — An official Court opinion was verified.

The arguments, in order

This case may have been argued more than once. Each entry below uses that session's official transcript. Later arguments do not erase earlier ones.

  1. Argument 1 ·

    What happened at the argument

    Mr. Kneedler argued the privilege is grounded in the Constitution.

    Mr. Arulanantham argued the FBI seeks dismissal of religion claims.

    Ms. Carroll argued Section 1806(f) provides a narrow mechanism.

    Read the official transcript for this argument · Official argument details

    Sources used for this argument breakdown

A citizen's guide to the whole case

What this case is about

The FBI argues the state secrets privilege protects national security. Plaintiffs argue the FBI seeks dismissal, not just exclusion.

Official sources for this section

How the case got here

The Supreme Court heard oral argument in this case on November 8, 2021.

Official sources for this section

What each side wants

The FBI wants the case dismissed to protect secrets.

Plaintiffs want to sue for damages from surveillance.

Official sources for this section

What each side says

The FBI claims the privilege is constitutional and critical.

Plaintiffs claim the FBI seeks dismissal of their claims.

Official sources for this section

What the justices asked

Justice Sotomayor asked about standing for unlawful surveillance claims.

Justice Kagan asked if the statute covers discovery and suppression.

Official sources for this section

Why it matters

This case defines the scope of the state secrets privilege. It determines whether plaintiffs can sue over surveillance. It balances national security against individual rights.

Official sources for this section

What happens next

This article currently covers the argument record. Use the official docket link for later case activity.

Official sources for this section

Official Court provenance

Official docket and case history · Official Supreme Court oral-argument detail page

Verified official opinions and orders

Title and summary sources

Revision history

  1. Revision 1 · Post Opinion ·

    Correction: Rewritten to the concise citizen-facing editorial standard.

  2. Revision 2 · Post Opinion ·

    Correction: Migrated to the dated official Court activity contract without model use.

Download this sanitized case as JSON