October Term 2021 · Docket 20-603

Does sovereign immunity block USERRA claims against Texas?

the sides that brought the case seek to sue Texas for USERRA violations. Texas claims sovereign immunity bars the suit.

Official caption
Torres v. Texas Dept. of Public Safety
Latest argument session
Latest official Court activity
Latest verified event
Decided
Sources analyzed through
Post Opinion

Verified source milestones

  1. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.
  2. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.
  3. — An official Court opinion was verified.

The arguments, in order

This case may have been argued more than once. Each entry below uses that session's official transcript. Later arguments do not erase earlier ones.

  1. Argument 1 ·

    What happened at the argument

    Mr. Tutt argued the Constitution grants Congress power to raise armies.

    Mr. Stone argued sovereign immunity limits means, not ends.

    questions_and_argument_context

    Read the official transcript for this argument · Official argument details

    Sources used for this argument breakdown

A citizen's guide to the whole case

What this case is about

This case tests whether sovereign immunity blocks USERRA claims against a state.

Official sources for this section

How the case got here

The Supreme Court heard oral argument in this case on March 29, 2022.

Official sources for this section

What each side wants

the sides that brought the case want to sue Texas for USERRA violations.

Texas wants the court to dismiss the suit.

Official sources for this section

What each side says

the sides that brought the case argue USERRA advances essential constitutional military powers.

Texas argues sovereign immunity limits congressional means.

Official sources for this section

What the justices asked

Justice Barrett asked how eminent domain ties to judicial proceedings.

Justice Kagan asked why war powers differ from other powers.

Official sources for this section

Why it matters

The outcome defines state liability for federal employment protections.

Official sources for this section

What happens next

This article currently covers the argument record. Use the official docket link for later case activity.

Official sources for this section

Official Court provenance

Official docket and case history · Official Supreme Court oral-argument detail page

Verified official opinions and orders

Title and summary sources

Revision history

  1. Revision 1 · Post Opinion ·

    Correction: Rewritten to the concise citizen-facing editorial standard.

  2. Revision 2 · Post Opinion ·

    Correction: Migrated to the dated official Court activity contract without model use.

Download this sanitized case as JSON