October Term 2021 · Docket 20-1459

Does an attempt to commit Hobbs Act robbery qualify as a crime of violence under federal law?

The dispute centers on whether the minimum conduct of an attempted robbery meets the statutory definition of a crime of violence.

Official caption
United States v. Taylor
Latest argument session
Latest official Court activity
Latest verified event
Decided
Sources analyzed through
Post Opinion

Verified source milestones

  1. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.
  2. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.
  3. — An official Court opinion was verified.

The arguments, in order

This case may have been argued more than once. Each entry below uses that session's official transcript. Later arguments do not erase earlier ones.

  1. Argument 1 ·

    What happened at the argument

    Ms. Taibleson argued that Congress intended to punish dangerous felons who use guns during violent crimes.

    Mr. Dreeben argued that an attempt to commit Hobbs Act robbery is not a crime of violence.

    Mr. Dreeben stated that the categorical approach focuses on the minimum conduct prohibited by the statute.

    Ms. Taibleson noted that the phrase threaten force appears in both the Hobbs Act and the sentencing statute.

    Read the official transcript for this argument · Official argument details

    Sources used for this argument breakdown

A citizen's guide to the whole case

What this case is about

This case tests the scope of federal sentencing enhancements for gun use during violent crimes.

Official sources for this section

How the case got here

The Supreme Court heard oral argument in this case on December 7, 2021.

Official sources for this section

What each side wants

The government seeks a conviction under the gun-use enhancement statute.

The defendant seeks to avoid the mandatory minimum sentence for gun use.

Official sources for this section

What each side says

The government argues that the defendant's conduct fits the statutory definition of a violent crime.

The defendant argues that an attempt to rob does not meet the legal standard for a crime of violence.

Official sources for this section

What the justices asked

Justice Sotomayor asked if the government would prosecute a person who holds a gun but never uses it.

Justice Thomas asked if abandoning the categorical approach would change the outcome of this case.

Official sources for this section

Why it matters

This case defines the scope of federal sentencing enhancements for gun use during violent crimes.

Official sources for this section

What happens next

This article currently covers the argument record. Use the official docket link for later case activity.

Official sources for this section

Official Court provenance

Official docket and case history · Official Supreme Court oral-argument detail page

Verified official opinions and orders

Title and summary sources

Revision history

  1. Revision 1 · Post Opinion ·

    Correction: Rewritten to the concise citizen-facing editorial standard.

  2. Revision 2 · Post Opinion ·

    Correction: Migrated to the dated official Court activity contract without model use.

Download this sanitized case as JSON