October Term 2021 · Docket 20-1143

Do federal courts hear motions to confirm arbitration awards?

Parties dispute whether federal courts hold jurisdiction over motions to confirm or vacate arbitration awards.

Official caption
Badgerow v. Walters
Latest argument session
Latest official Court activity
Latest verified event
Decided
Sources analyzed through
Post Opinion

Verified source milestones

  1. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.
  2. — An official Court opinion was verified.

The arguments, in order

This case may have been argued more than once. Each entry below uses that session's official transcript. Later arguments do not erase earlier ones.

  1. Argument 1 ·

    What happened at the argument

    the side that brought the case argues the FAA text controls the outcome.

    the opposing side argues the FAA treats award motions as underlying disputes.

    questions_asked_by_justices

    Read the official transcript for this argument · Official argument details

    Sources used for this argument breakdown

A citizen's guide to the whole case

What this case is about

The case tests the scope of federal court jurisdiction under the Federal Arbitration Act.

Official sources for this section

How the case got here

The Supreme Court heard oral argument in this case on November 2, 2021.

Official sources for this section

What each side wants

the side that brought the case wants state courts to hear these motions.

the opposing side wants federal courts to hear these motions.

Official sources for this section

What each side says

the side that brought the case argues the FAA text limits federal jurisdiction.

the opposing side argues federal courts have jurisdiction over underlying disputes.

Official sources for this section

What the justices asked

Justice Kagan asked when Sections 9 and 10 grant federal jurisdiction.

Justice Kavanaugh asked about the historical understanding of the Act.

Official sources for this section

Why it matters

This dispute determines which courts handle arbitration enforcement motions.

Official sources for this section

What happens next

This article currently covers the argument record. Use the official docket link for later case activity.

Official sources for this section

Official Court provenance

Official docket and case history · Official Supreme Court oral-argument detail page

Verified official opinions and orders

Title and summary sources

Revision history

  1. Revision 1 · Post Opinion ·

    Correction: Rewritten to the concise citizen-facing editorial standard.

  2. Revision 2 · Post Opinion ·

    Correction: Migrated to the dated official Court activity contract without model use.

Download this sanitized case as JSON