October Term 2020 · Docket 20-222

Can generic statements defeat a securities fraud class action?

The dispute centers on whether generic statements can defeat a securities fraud class action.

Official caption
Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. v. Arkansas Teacher Retirement System
Latest argument session
Latest official Court activity
Latest verified event
Decided
Sources analyzed through
Post Opinion

Verified source milestones

  1. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.
  2. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.
  3. — An official Court opinion was verified.

The arguments, in order

This case may have been argued more than once. Each entry below uses that session's official transcript. Later arguments do not erase earlier ones.

  1. Argument 1 ·

    What happened at the argument

    Goldman Sachs argues the lower court erred in certifying the class.

    Arkansas Teacher Retirement System argues the lower court correctly certified the class.

    questions_asked_by_justices

    Read the official transcript for this argument · Official argument details

    Sources used for this argument breakdown

A citizen's guide to the whole case

What this case is about

This case involves a securities class action. The lower court certified the class. The parties dispute the legal standard for price impact.

Official sources for this section

How the case got here

The Supreme Court heard oral argument in this case on March 29, 2021.

Official sources for this section

What each side wants

Goldman Sachs wants the Court to reverse the class certification.

Arkansas Teacher Retirement System wants the Court to affirm the class certification.

Official sources for this section

What each side says

Goldman Sachs argues generic statements show no price impact.

Arkansas Teacher Retirement System argues generic statements do not preclude price impact.

Official sources for this section

What the justices asked

Justice Breyer asked what the specific legal issue is.

Chief Justice Roberts asked if expert testimony is required or optional.

Official sources for this section

Why it matters

This case defines how courts evaluate generic statements in fraud claims. It determines the burden of proof for class certification. It affects the viability of securities class actions nationwide.

Official sources for this section

What happens next

This article currently covers the argument record. Use the official docket link for later case activity.

Official sources for this section

Official Court provenance

Official docket and case history · Official Supreme Court oral-argument detail page

Verified official opinions and orders

Title and summary sources

Revision history

  1. Revision 1 · Post Opinion ·

    Correction: Rewritten to the concise citizen-facing editorial standard.

  2. Revision 2 · Post Opinion ·

    Correction: Migrated to the dated official Court activity contract without model use.

Download this sanitized case as JSON