October Term 2020 · Docket 20-18

Can police enter a home without a warrant during hot pursuit?

The dispute centers on whether a categorical hot pursuit rule allows warrantless home entries.

Official caption
Lange v. California
Latest argument session
Latest official Court activity
Latest verified event
Decided
Sources analyzed through
Post Opinion

Verified source milestones

  1. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.
  2. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.
  3. — An official Court opinion was verified.

The arguments, in order

This case may have been argued more than once. Each entry below uses that session's official transcript. Later arguments do not erase earlier ones.

  1. Argument 1 ·

    What happened at the argument

    Jeffrey Fisher argues no precedent supports the categorical pursuit rule applied below.

    Fisher states officers need a magistrate approval unless an emergency exists.

    Ms. Rice argues the Fourth Amendment generally requires warrants for home entries.

    Rice contends hot pursuit is a valid exception to the warrant requirement.

    Read the official transcript for this argument · Official argument details

    Sources used for this argument breakdown

A citizen's guide to the whole case

What this case is about

This case tests the scope of the Fourth Amendment's warrant requirement during police chases.

Official sources for this section

How the case got here

The Supreme Court heard oral argument in this case on February 24, 2021.

Official sources for this section

What each side wants

the side that brought the case seeks a case-specific exigency showing for every warrantless entry.

the opposing side seeks a categorical rule allowing entry during any hot pursuit.

Official sources for this section

What each side says

the side that brought the case argues no precedent supports a categorical pursuit rule for home entries.

the opposing side argues hot pursuit is a recognized exception to the warrant requirement.

Official sources for this section

What the justices asked

Justice Thomas asks how common law treats officers pursuing a breach of the peace.

Justice Breyer asks what the Court should do with conflicting common law cases.

Official sources for this section

Why it matters

The outcome defines the boundary between police authority and private home security.

Official sources for this section

What happens next

This article currently covers the argument record. Use the official docket link for later case activity.

Official sources for this section

Official Court provenance

Official docket and case history · Official Supreme Court oral-argument detail page

Verified official opinions and orders

Title and summary sources

Revision history

  1. Revision 1 · Post Opinion ·

    Correction: Rewritten to the concise citizen-facing editorial standard.

  2. Revision 2 · Post Opinion ·

    Correction: Migrated to the dated official Court activity contract without model use.

Download this sanitized case as JSON