October Term 2018 · Docket 17-646

Can states and federal governments prosecute the same act?

the sides that brought the case argue the Double Jeopardy Clause bars dual sovereign prosecutions. The government claims separate powers allow both trials.

Official caption
Gamble v. United States
Latest argument session
Latest official Court activity
Latest verified event
Argued
Sources analyzed through
Official Transcript

Verified source milestones

  1. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.
  2. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.

The arguments, in order

This case may have been argued more than once. Each entry below uses that session's official transcript. Later arguments do not erase earlier ones.

  1. Argument 1 ·

    What happened at the argument

    Mr. Chaiten argued the clause text bars dual trials.

    Mr. Feigin argued distinct powers create separate offenses.

    Justices questioned the scope of foreign judgments.

    Read the official transcript for this argument · Official argument details

    Sources used for this argument breakdown

A citizen's guide to the whole case

What this case is about

This case tests the separate sovereigns doctrine. the sides that brought the case seek to strike down the rule. The government defends the current practice.

Official sources for this section

How the case got here

The Supreme Court heard oral argument in this case on December 6, 2018.

Official sources for this section

What each side wants

the sides that brought the case want the Court to ban dual prosecutions.

The government wants to keep dual prosecutions legal.

Official sources for this section

What each side says

the sides that brought the case argue the clause text forbids dual trials.

The government argues distinct powers create separate offenses.

Official sources for this section

What the justices asked

Justice Ginsburg asked if foreign judgments count.

Justice Alito asked for a direct answer on accuracy.

Official sources for this section

Why it matters

This dispute defines the limits of state power. It shapes how prosecutors handle overlapping crimes. It affects every citizen facing dual trials.

Official sources for this section

What happens next

This article currently covers the argument record. Use the official docket link for later case activity.

Official sources for this section

Official Court provenance

Official docket and case history · Official Supreme Court oral-argument detail page

Title and summary sources

Revision history

  1. Revision 1 · Official Transcript ·

    Correction: Rewritten to the concise citizen-facing editorial standard.

  2. Revision 2 · Official Transcript ·

    Correction: Migrated to the dated official Court activity contract without model use.

Download this sanitized case as JSON