October Term 2018 · Docket 17-1625

Does the Copyright Act allow full litigation costs or only a statutory list?

Rimini Street seeks full litigation costs. Oracle argues for a limited statutory list.

Official caption
Rimini Street, Inc. v. Oracle USA, Inc.
Latest argument session
Latest official Court activity
Latest verified event
Argued
Sources analyzed through
Official Transcript

Verified source milestones

  1. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.
  2. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.

The arguments, in order

This case may have been argued more than once. Each entry below uses that session's official transcript. Later arguments do not erase earlier ones.

  1. Argument 1 ·

    What happened at the argument

    Mr. Clement argued the statute authorizes full costs.

    Mr. Perry argued costs are a defined legal term.

    Mr. Kedem argued the statutory list guides courts.

    Read the official transcript for this argument · Official argument details

    Sources used for this argument breakdown

A citizen's guide to the whole case

What this case is about

The dispute centers on the meaning of full costs in copyright law.

Official sources for this section

How the case got here

The Supreme Court heard oral argument in this case on January 14, 2019.

Official sources for this section

What each side wants

Rimini Street wants recovery of all litigation expenses.

Oracle wants costs limited to a specific statutory list.

Official sources for this section

What each side says

Rimini Street argues the statute authorizes full costs.

Oracle argues costs are a defined legal term.

Official sources for this section

What the justices asked

Justice Sotomayor asked about the historical meaning of costs.

Justice Breyer asked about state statute influences on awards.

Official sources for this section

Why it matters

The outcome defines the financial risk for copyright litigants nationwide.

Official sources for this section

What happens next

This article currently covers the argument record. Use the official docket link for later case activity.

Official sources for this section

Official Court provenance

Official docket and case history · Official Supreme Court oral-argument detail page

Title and summary sources

Revision history

  1. Revision 1 · Official Transcript ·

    Correction: Rewritten to the concise citizen-facing editorial standard.

  2. Revision 2 · Official Transcript ·

    Correction: Migrated to the dated official Court activity contract without model use.

Download this sanitized case as JSON