October Term 2018 · Docket 17-1026

Does a guilty plea waiver bar a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel?

The dispute centers on whether a defendant can challenge a guilty plea waiver for ineffective assistance of counsel.

Official caption
Garza v. Idaho
Latest argument session
Latest official Court activity
Latest verified event
Argued
Sources analyzed through
Official Transcript

Verified source milestones

  1. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.
  2. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.

The arguments, in order

This case may have been argued more than once. Each entry below uses that session's official transcript. Later arguments do not erase earlier ones.

  1. Argument 1 ·

    What happened at the argument

    Mr. Kedem stated that a prejudice inquiry identifies judgments to reopen.

    Justice Sotomayor asked what a defense attorney generally does first when a client wants to appeal.

    Justice Ginsburg noted the plea agreement gave fewer years than the law allowed.

    Mr. Ali cited a unanimous Court holding that disregarding an appeal instruction is ineffective assistance.

    Read the official transcript for this argument · Official argument details

    Sources used for this argument breakdown

A citizen's guide to the whole case

What this case is about

Garza v. Idaho

Official sources for this section

How the case got here

The Supreme Court heard oral argument in this case on October 30, 2018.

Official sources for this section

What each side wants

the side that brought the case seeks reinstatement of the right to appeal.

the opposing side seeks to enforce the appeal waiver in the plea agreement.

Official sources for this section

What each side says

the side that brought the case argues that disregarding an instruction to appeal renders assistance ineffective.

the opposing side argues that the waiver bars the claim of ineffective assistance.

Official sources for this section

What the justices asked

Chief Justice Roberts asked if the issue falls within the appeal waiver scope.

Justice Alito asked if violating the waiver breaks the plea bargain by the defendant.

Official sources for this section

Why it matters

This case defines the scope of appeal waivers in guilty pleas. It determines whether defendants can challenge counsel's performance after pleading guilty. The outcome affects the finality of criminal judgments. It impacts the balance between plea deal stability and constitutional rights.

Official sources for this section

What happens next

This article currently covers the argument record. Use the official docket link for later case activity.

Official sources for this section

Official Court provenance

Official docket and case history · Official Supreme Court oral-argument detail page

Title and summary sources

Revision history

  1. Revision 1 · Official Transcript ·

    Correction: Rewritten to the concise citizen-facing editorial standard.

  2. Revision 2 · Official Transcript ·

    Correction: Migrated to the dated official Court activity contract without model use.

Download this sanitized case as JSON