October Term 2018 · Docket 16-1094

Does the Vienna Convention allow serving foreign states by mail?

Sudan argues the treaty bans mail service. Victims claim the treaty allows it.

Official caption
Republic of Sudan v. Harrison
Latest argument session
Latest official Court activity
Latest verified event
Argued
Sources analyzed through
Official Transcript

Verified source milestones

  1. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.
  2. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.

The arguments, in order

This case may have been argued more than once. Each entry below uses that session's official transcript. Later arguments do not erase earlier ones.

  1. Argument 1 ·

    What happened at the argument

    Sudan's lawyer argued the treaty bans mail service.

    Victims' lawyer argued the treaty allows mail service.

    justice_question

    Read the official transcript for this argument · Official argument details

    Sources used for this argument breakdown

A citizen's guide to the whole case

What this case is about

The case tests if the Vienna Convention permits serving a foreign state by mail. Sudan says the treaty bans this method. Victims say the treaty allows it. The Court must interpret the treaty text.

Official sources for this section

How the case got here

The Supreme Court heard oral argument in this case on November 7, 2018.

Official sources for this section

What each side wants

Sudan wants to reverse the $300 million judgment.

Victims want to keep the $300 million judgment.

Official sources for this section

What each side says

Sudan argues the Vienna Convention bans service by mail.

Victims argue the Vienna Convention allows service by mail.

Official sources for this section

What the justices asked

Justice Kagan asked if the statute requires delivery to an office.

Justice Sotomayor asked about ministers not sitting in capitals.

Official sources for this section

Why it matters

This case defines how nations receive legal papers. It affects international litigation costs. It shapes diplomatic relations between states.

Official sources for this section

What happens next

This article currently covers the argument record. Use the official docket link for later case activity.

Official sources for this section

Official Court provenance

Official docket and case history · Official Supreme Court oral-argument detail page

Title and summary sources

Revision history

  1. Revision 1 · Official Transcript ·

    Correction: Rewritten to the concise citizen-facing editorial standard.

  2. Revision 2 · Official Transcript ·

    Correction: Migrated to the dated official Court activity contract without model use.

Download this sanitized case as JSON