October Term 2017 · Docket 17-586

Can a state appeal a court order to consult on redistricting before the final map is drawn?

Texas officials seek to appeal a federal order requiring them to consult with mapmakers. Opponents argue this order is not final and cannot be appealed yet.

Official caption
Abbott v. Perez
Latest argument session
Latest official Court activity
Latest verified event
Argued
Sources analyzed through
Official Transcript

Verified source milestones

  1. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.
  2. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.

The arguments, in order

This case may have been argued more than once. Each entry below uses that session's official transcript. Later arguments do not erase earlier ones.

  1. Argument 1 ·

    What happened at the argument

    Justice Breyer asked if the consultation order is an injunction.

    Justice Sotomayor noted the court asked about intent, not action.

    Texas officials argued the 2011 process was not a preliminary injunction.

    Opponents argued the order did not command specific redrawing actions.

    Read the official transcript for this argument · Official argument details

    Sources used for this argument breakdown

A citizen's guide to the whole case

What this case is about

Texas officials want to appeal a federal court order. They argue the order is final. Opponents say the order is not final. The Court must decide if the appeal is allowed.

Official sources for this section

How the case got here

The Supreme Court heard oral argument in this case on April 24, 2018.

Official sources for this section

What each side wants

Texas officials want the Supreme Court to allow their appeal of the consultation order.

Opponents want the Supreme Court to reject the appeal as premature.

Official sources for this section

What each side says

Texas officials argue the consultation order is a final, appealable action.

Opponents argue the order is not final because the redistricting process is incomplete.

Official sources for this section

What the justices asked

Justice Kagan asked if this situation is common in districting cases.

Justice Sotomayor asked why the order is not final under prior precedent.

Official sources for this section

Why it matters

This case defines when states can challenge federal redistricting orders. It affects the timing of legal challenges to state maps. It shapes the balance of power between courts and legislatures.

Official sources for this section

What happens next

This article currently covers the argument record. Use the official docket link for later case activity.

Official sources for this section

Official Court provenance

Official docket and case history · Official Supreme Court oral-argument detail page

Title and summary sources

Revision history

  1. Revision 1 · Official Transcript ·

    Correction: Rewritten to the concise citizen-facing editorial standard.

  2. Revision 2 · Official Transcript ·

    Correction: Migrated to the dated official Court activity contract without model use.

Download this sanitized case as JSON