October Term 2017 · Docket 16-961

Does the Supreme Court have jurisdiction to review military court decisions?

the sides that brought the case seek Supreme Court review of military court rulings. The government argues the Court lacks jurisdiction.

Official caption
Dalmazzi v. United States
Latest argument session
Latest official Court activity
Latest verified event
Argued
Sources analyzed through
Official Transcript

Verified source milestones

  1. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.
  2. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.

The arguments, in order

This case may have been argued more than once. Each entry below uses that session's official transcript. Later arguments do not erase earlier ones.

  1. Argument 1 ·

    What happened at the argument

    Mr. Vladeck argued for a distinction between appointed and assigned officers.

    Mr. Fletcher argued the Court has valid appellate jurisdiction under Section 1259.

    Mr. Bamzai argued the Court lacks Article III jurisdiction over executive branch entities.

    Read the official transcript for this argument · Official argument details

    Sources used for this argument breakdown

A citizen's guide to the whole case

What this case is about

This case involves the scope of Supreme Court jurisdiction over military tribunals.

Official sources for this section

How the case got here

The Supreme Court heard oral argument in this case on January 16, 2018.

Official sources for this section

What each side wants

the sides that brought the case want the Supreme Court to review the military court decisions.

The government wants the Supreme Court to dismiss the case for lack of jurisdiction.

Official sources for this section

What each side says

the sides that brought the case argue the Court has appellate jurisdiction under Section 1259.

The government argues the Court lacks Article III jurisdiction over executive branch entities.

Official sources for this section

What the justices asked

Justice Ginsburg asked about the status of civilians on the CMCR.

Justice Sotomayor asked about the phrase except as otherwise authorized by law.

Official sources for this section

Why it matters

This dispute determines the scope of federal judicial review over military tribunals.

Official sources for this section

What happens next

This article currently covers the argument record. Use the official docket link for later case activity.

Official sources for this section

Official Court provenance

Official docket and case history · Official Supreme Court oral-argument detail page

Title and summary sources

Revision history

  1. Revision 1 · Official Transcript ·

    Correction: Rewritten to the concise citizen-facing editorial standard.

  2. Revision 2 · Official Transcript ·

    Correction: Migrated to the dated official Court activity contract without model use.

Download this sanitized case as JSON