October Term 2015 · Docket 14-280

Does the Supreme Court have jurisdiction to apply a new federal rule to state prisoners?

The dispute centers on whether the Court can decide if a new federal rule applies to state prisoners.

Official caption
Montgomery v. Louisiana
Latest argument session
Latest official Court activity
Latest verified event
Argued
Sources analyzed through
Official Transcript

Verified source milestones

  1. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.
  2. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.

The arguments, in order

This case may have been argued more than once. Each entry below uses that session's official transcript. Later arguments do not erase earlier ones.

  1. Argument 1 ·

    What happened at the argument

    Mr. Bernstein argued the Court should decide the issue now.

    Mr. Dreeben argued Louisiana voluntarily incorporated a federal standard.

    Mr. Plaisance argued the state court relied exclusively on federal law.

    Read the official transcript for this argument · Official argument details

    Sources used for this argument breakdown

A citizen's guide to the whole case

What this case is about

This case tests the Court's power to apply federal rules to state cases.

Official sources for this section

How the case got here

The Supreme Court heard oral argument in this case on October 13, 2015.

Official sources for this section

What each side wants

One side wants the Court to decide the case now.

The other side wants the Court to decline jurisdiction.

Official sources for this section

What each side says

One side argues Louisiana adopted a federal standard.

The other side argues the Court lacks jurisdiction here.

Official sources for this section

What the justices asked

Justice Kennedy asked if the Supremacy Clause binds states only in direct criminal cases.

Justice Sotomayor asked how this case differs from Standard Oil.

Official sources for this section

Why it matters

This case defines the Court's power over state criminal law.

Official sources for this section

What happens next

This article currently covers the argument record. Use the official docket link for later case activity.

Official sources for this section

Official Court provenance

Official docket and case history · Official Supreme Court oral-argument detail page

Title and summary sources

Revision history

  1. Revision 1 · Official Transcript ·

    Correction: Rewritten to the concise citizen-facing editorial standard.

  2. Revision 2 · Official Transcript ·

    Correction: Migrated to the dated official Court activity contract without model use.

Download this sanitized case as JSON