October Term 2015 · Docket 14-1175

Can a state sue another state for torts committed against its residents?

California seeks to sue Nevada for injuries to Californians. Nevada claims sovereign immunity blocks the suit.

Official caption
Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Hyatt
Latest argument session
Latest official Court activity
Latest verified event
Argued
Sources analyzed through
Official Transcript

Verified source milestones

  1. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.
  2. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.

The arguments, in order

This case may have been argued more than once. Each entry below uses that session's official transcript. Later arguments do not erase earlier ones.

  1. Argument 1 ·

    What happened at the argument

    Clement argued states feared bankruptcy from citizen suits.

    Farr argued against overruling the Nevada v. Hall precedent.

    sotomayor_questioned_if_states_are_forced_to_waive_immunity

    kagan_noted_states_can_retaliate_against_each_other

    Read the official transcript for this argument · Official argument details

    Sources used for this argument breakdown

A citizen's guide to the whole case

What this case is about

California wants to recover damages for injuries to its residents. Nevada argues the Constitution bars suits against states.

Official sources for this section

How the case got here

The Supreme Court heard oral argument in this case on December 7, 2015.

Official sources for this section

What each side wants

California wants to sue Nevada for torts against its residents.

Nevada wants to keep its immunity from such suits.

Official sources for this section

What each side says

California argues states can sue each other for torts.

Nevada argues sovereign immunity blocks all such suits.

Official sources for this section

What the justices asked

Justice Sotomayor asked if states are forced to waive immunity.

Justice Kagan noted states can retaliate against each other.

Official sources for this section

Why it matters

This case defines state power over interstate tort claims. It shapes how states handle cross-border injuries.

Official sources for this section

What happens next

This article currently covers the argument record. Use the official docket link for later case activity.

Official sources for this section

Official Court provenance

Official docket and case history · Official Supreme Court oral-argument detail page

Title and summary sources

Revision history

  1. Revision 1 · Official Transcript ·

    Correction: Rewritten to the concise citizen-facing editorial standard.

  2. Revision 2 · Official Transcript ·

    Correction: Migrated to the dated official Court activity contract without model use.

Download this sanitized case as JSON