October Term 2014 · Docket 13-935

Can a bankruptcy court decide a state law claim against a third party?

The dispute centers on whether Congress can authorize bankruptcy judges to resolve state law claims that seek to add third-party property to a debtor's estate.

Official caption
Wellness Int'l Network Ltd. v. Sharif
Latest argument session
Latest official Court activity
Latest verified event
Argued
Sources analyzed through
Official Transcript

Verified source milestones

  1. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.
  2. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.

The arguments, in order

This case may have been argued more than once. Each entry below uses that session's official transcript. Later arguments do not erase earlier ones.

  1. Argument 1 ·

    What happened at the argument

    Catherine Steege argued the claim meets the test for bankruptcy court jurisdiction.

    She stated the claim stems from the bankruptcy itself.

    She noted the debtor holds actual possession of the property.

    Mr. Gannon agreed with the sides that brought the case on the questions presented.

    Read the official transcript for this argument · Official argument details

    Sources used for this argument breakdown

A citizen's guide to the whole case

What this case is about

This case tests the limits of bankruptcy court power. The core issue is whether Article III of the Constitution prevents Congress from allowing these courts to decide certain state law claims.

Official sources for this section

How the case got here

The Supreme Court heard oral argument in this case on January 14, 2015.

Official sources for this section

What each side wants

the sides that brought the case want the Supreme Court to affirm the bankruptcy court's authority to decide the state law claim.

the opposing side wants the Supreme Court to reverse the lower court and bar the bankruptcy judge from deciding the claim.

Official sources for this section

What each side says

the sides that brought the case argue the claim stems directly from the bankruptcy case, satisfying the constitutional test for bankruptcy court jurisdiction.

the opposing side argues the claim seeks third-party property, which Congress cannot remove from Article III court jurisdiction.

Official sources for this section

What the justices asked

Justice Sotomayor asked if the bankruptcy court could have subpoenaed the third party to appear.

Justice Breyer asked if the claim regarding a living trust is legally distinct from other third-party property claims.

Official sources for this section

Why it matters

This case defines the boundary between federal bankruptcy courts and Article III courts. It determines which judges can resolve disputes over property belonging to third parties. The outcome shapes the efficiency and constitutional limits of the federal bankruptcy system.

Official sources for this section

What happens next

This article currently covers the argument record. Use the official docket link for later case activity.

Official sources for this section

Official Court provenance

Official docket and case history · Official Supreme Court oral-argument detail page

Title and summary sources

Revision history

  1. Revision 1 · Official Transcript ·

    Correction: Rewritten to the concise citizen-facing editorial standard.

  2. Revision 2 · Official Transcript ·

    Correction: Migrated to the dated official Court activity contract without model use.

Download this sanitized case as JSON