October Term 2012 · Docket 12-25

Does the DPPA ban lawyers from buying DMV data for litigation?

Lawyers want to buy DMV records for lawsuits. The state says the DPPA bans this bulk sale.

Official caption
Maracich v. Spears
Latest argument session
Latest official Court activity
Latest verified event
Argued
Sources analyzed through
Official Transcript

Verified source milestones

  1. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.
  2. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.

The arguments, in order

This case may have been argued more than once. Each entry below uses that session's official transcript. Later arguments do not erase earlier ones.

  1. Argument 1 ·

    What happened at the argument

    Mr. Guerra argues the DPPA requires express consent.

    He says the litigation exception does not apply.

    Mr. Clement argues Congress did not manage attorney solicitation.

    He says states always controlled this area.

    Read the official transcript for this argument · Official argument details

    Sources used for this argument breakdown

A citizen's guide to the whole case

What this case is about

The DPPA restricts state DMV data sales. It imposes civil and criminal penalties for violations. It directly regulates state database use.

Official sources for this section

How the case got here

The Supreme Court heard oral argument in this case on January 9, 2013.

Official sources for this section

What each side wants

the sides that brought the case want to buy DMV data for litigation.

the opposing sides want to block this bulk data sale.

Official sources for this section

What each side says

the sides that brought the case argue the DPPA does not cover lawyers.

the opposing sides argue the DPPA bans bulk solicitation sales.

Official sources for this section

What the justices asked

Does the research exception cover university projects?

Does the statute cover state health marketing?

Official sources for this section

Why it matters

This case defines state data privacy limits. It shapes commercial data sales rules. It impacts legal research and marketing.

Official sources for this section

What happens next

This article currently covers the argument record. Use the official docket link for later case activity.

Official sources for this section

Official Court provenance

Official docket and case history · Official Supreme Court oral-argument detail page

Title and summary sources

Revision history

  1. Revision 1 · Official Transcript ·

    Correction: Rewritten to the concise citizen-facing editorial standard.

  2. Revision 2 · Official Transcript ·

    Correction: Migrated to the dated official Court activity contract without model use.

Download this sanitized case as JSON