October Term 2011 · Docket 10-1018

Can a private lawyer claim qualified immunity for a personnel investigation?

A private attorney argues he acted as a state agent. the opposing side claims he lacked official authority.

Official caption
Filarsky v. Delia
Latest argument session
Latest official Court activity
Latest verified event
Argued
Sources analyzed through
Official Transcript

Verified source milestones

  1. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.
  2. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.

The arguments, in order

This case may have been argued more than once. Each entry below uses that session's official transcript. Later arguments do not erase earlier ones.

  1. Argument 1 ·

    What happened at the argument

    Ms. Millett argued the side that brought the case worked side-by-side with officials.

    Ms. Saharsky stated the side that brought the case acted under supervision.

    chief_justice_roberts_noted the test lacks clear assurance.

    Read the official transcript for this argument · Official argument details

    Sources used for this argument breakdown

A citizen's guide to the whole case

What this case is about

The case tests whether a private lawyer can claim qualified immunity. the side that brought the case says he acted under state supervision. the opposing side says he was a private actor.

Official sources for this section

How the case got here

The Supreme Court heard oral argument in this case on January 17, 2012.

Official sources for this section

What each side wants

the side that brought the case wants the court to grant him qualified immunity.

the opposing side wants the court to deny the immunity claim.

Official sources for this section

What each side says

the side that brought the case argues he acted under state supervision.

the opposing side argues he was a private actor.

Official sources for this section

What the justices asked

Justice Sotomayor asked why the functional test does not apply here.

Justice Ginsburg asked if any private attorney lacks qualified immunity.

Official sources for this section

Why it matters

This case defines the scope of qualified immunity for private contractors. It clarifies when private actors act as state agents. It affects future civil rights litigation involving government contractors.

Official sources for this section

What happens next

This article currently covers the argument record. Use the official docket link for later case activity.

Official sources for this section

Official Court provenance

Official docket and case history · Official Supreme Court oral-argument detail page

Title and summary sources

Revision history

  1. Revision 1 · Official Transcript ·

    Correction: Rewritten to the concise citizen-facing editorial standard.

  2. Revision 2 · Official Transcript ·

    Correction: Migrated to the dated official Court activity contract without model use.

Download this sanitized case as JSON